Law Journal Newsletters

An ALM Website

The Red Zone

The RED ZONE - Selecting Outside Counsel

By Allan Colman, Managing Director, the Closers Group: acolman@closersgroup.com

  • E-Mail this Article
  • View Printable Article

HIDDEN DECISION MAKING - Last week we began a discussion of the pressures in-house counsel face in making their decisions to hire counsel. This week we will look more closely at Hidden Decision Making.

To overcome hidden decision making, a law firm's red-zone strategy must include a systematic approach to finding out what the decision-makers won't reveal on their own. Who is the real buyer of the service the law firm is selling? Who is its real user? When are the decision-maker and the jperson the company sent to the sales meeting the same person?

Holding pre-meeting, pre-presentation discussions in person or by phone are a must. And if this is a new potential client, identify other vendors used by the company and with whom you have relationships. Research at this stage will greatly enhance your opportunity to pursue and close this engagement

Please enter your comments below or through acolman@closersgroup.com.

Happy May Day!

Comments

Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.

Add your comments

Log In

You must be logged in to comment

Register

Enter your information below to begin your FREE registration

MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

COMMERCIAL LEASING LAW & STRATEGY

Office vs. Retail Leasing: Practical Considerations for the Retail Tenant

Experienced retail tenants are generally well versed in commonly negotiated retail provisions such as those pertaining to exclusive use rights, opening and operating co-tenancies, "go-dark" rights and percentage rent. This article discusses some of the material differences between common leasing concepts addressed in both retail and office leases.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY STRATEGIST

A Blurry Distinction with a Huge Difference: Commercial vs. Non-Commercial Speech

Imagine the following two scenarios, and try to figure out what the real difference is. First, your competitor blatantly lies in its advertising about the effectiveness of its products; second, your competitor blatantly lies to a reporter about the effectiveness of its products, and the reporter publishes the lies in an article or in a magazine. It seems like the same situation, but it is not. With the first, you could sue for false advertising because the advertisement is “commercial” speech, whereas with the second, you cannot because the magazine article is “non-commercial” speech. A similar difference is presented if a newspaper uses a picture of a celebrity without the celebrity’s consent to highlight a news article, as opposed to a company using the same celebrity picture in a print advertisement, in the same newspaper, to promote the company. A breach of the celebrity’s right of publicity claim is not available against the newspaper because the news article is “non-commercial,” but is available against the company because the print advertisement is “commercial.” The rationale for both is that while the First Amendment fully protects “non-commercial” speech, it protects “commercial’ speech in a significantly limited way.

Tweets