Law Journal Newsletters

An ALM Website

The Marcus Perspective

Cut ‘Em Off At the Impasse

  • E-Mail this Article
  • View Printable Article
Winning Against an Equal Marketing Opponent

Picture this.

A narrow foot bridge across a great chasm, wide enough for only one person at a time to pass.

Two men of equal size meet in the middle, each intending to get to the other side. Let me pass, says one. Im very strong, and Ill smite you.

Im very strong, too, says the other. I can smite you harder.

I have a club and a knife, says one.

I have a club and a knife as well, says the other.

I have a sword.

I have a sword, too,

I have a gun.

I, too, have a gun.

Impasse. Both equal in might, both equally armed. Who, then, wins? Why, the cleverer of the two. Perhaps the one who says, Look over there, or, Lets toss a coin. Or the one who is the more accomplished and artful swordsman.

The point is that in legal marketing, we are now like the two men on the bridge. We are all equally armed, with the same professional skills (or an inability to project superior professional skill), and most significantly, with the same marketing tools. The seminars. The articles. The brochures. The networking. The Web site. The press release. Who wins the competitive battle, then?

The one who best understands the market. The one who says, I have a portion of my clientele in declining industries, a portion in static industries, a portion in emerging industries. Ill focus on getting clients in the emerging industries, and find ways to keep those in the other two.

  • The one who understands the changing nature of the legal marketing profession. The breakdown in the barriers between accounting and law. The expansion of professional services from accounting to consulting, from legal services to financing and business consulting, and so forth. The changing nature of the commercial world, and its new demands on the profession. The new technology, and what it really means. The emerging freedom from the billable hour, and the non-competitive fee.
  • The one who understands positioning, and that it comes not from within the firm, but from within the needs of the market, and that the firm exists to meet those needs.
  • The one who really has the better professional skills, and keeps them honed, and can demonstrate them consistently.
  • The one who is capable of understanding that traditional professional law firm managing skills are no longer sufficient, because more is required of the professional law firm manager than just collegiality, or longevity. Who understands that work must flow, and that people must be motivated, and that productivity counts. Who understands that running a business is more than just accumulating fees at a greater rate than the fees are spent.
  • The one whos marketing skills are better honed, better understood, more thoughtfully and imaginatively used.

In a world in which everybody has the same weapons and tools, this is the individual who is going to prevail. Make it a checklist.


Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.

Add your comments

Log In

You must be logged in to comment


Enter your information below to begin your FREE registration



Office vs. Retail Leasing: Practical Considerations for the Retail Tenant

Experienced retail tenants are generally well versed in commonly negotiated retail provisions such as those pertaining to exclusive use rights, opening and operating co-tenancies, "go-dark" rights and percentage rent. This article discusses some of the material differences between common leasing concepts addressed in both retail and office leases.


A Blurry Distinction with a Huge Difference: Commercial vs. Non-Commercial Speech

Imagine the following two scenarios, and try to figure out what the real difference is. First, your competitor blatantly lies in its advertising about the effectiveness of its products; second, your competitor blatantly lies to a reporter about the effectiveness of its products, and the reporter publishes the lies in an article or in a magazine. It seems like the same situation, but it is not. With the first, you could sue for false advertising because the advertisement is “commercial” speech, whereas with the second, you cannot because the magazine article is “non-commercial” speech. A similar difference is presented if a newspaper uses a picture of a celebrity without the celebrity’s consent to highlight a news article, as opposed to a company using the same celebrity picture in a print advertisement, in the same newspaper, to promote the company. A breach of the celebrity’s right of publicity claim is not available against the newspaper because the news article is “non-commercial,” but is available against the company because the print advertisement is “commercial.” The rationale for both is that while the First Amendment fully protects “non-commercial” speech, it protects “commercial’ speech in a significantly limited way.