Law Journal Newsletters

An ALM Website

BUSINESS CRIMES BULLETIN

September 2008

Bringing Sentencing Sanity to Operation Malicious Mortgage

By Evan A. Jenness

Harsh sentences can be generated by a rote application of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines in mortgage fraud cases. Challenging the scope of "relevant conduct" should be defense counsel's first line of attack in many cases, because victims’ losses may not have resulted from a convicted client’s activities or the reasonably foreseeable acts of others in furtherance of jointly undertaken criminal activity under § 1B1.3.

Log In

Subscribers: Log in below to read the full story

Already subscribe but haven't registered for all the benefits of the website?

Subscribe

Click below to subscribe to
BUSINESS CRIMES BULLETIN

Subscribe

Pay-Per-View

You can purchase this article for $20.00
Click below

Purchase Article

ARTICLES FROM RELATED NEWSLETTERS

INSURANCE COVERAGE LAW BULLETIN

UPDATE -- Blurred Lines

In the March 2014 issue, in their article titled “Blurred Lines,” the authors discussed a number of decisions from various jurisdictions concerning the applicability of the attorney-client privilege and work-product doctrine in the context of an insurer's claims investigation. Among those decisions was National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. TransCanada Energy USA, Inc.

THE CORPORATE COUNSELOR

How Privileged Are Your Privileged Communications?

Corporate counsel may be surprised to learn that, under certain circumstances, plaintiffs in shareholder litigation have gained access to privileged materials upon a showing of "good cause" under the fiduciary exception. This article discusses the basis for the fiduciary exception, the factors involved in the good-cause analysis, and the circumstances under which courts have turned over privileged materials to plaintiffs.