Law Journal Newsletters

An ALM Website

EMPLOYMENT LAW STRATEGIST

February 2010

Class Litigation of Meal and Rest Period Claims

May Meal and Rest Period Claims Be Certified in a Post-Brinker World?

By Matt C. Bailey

In Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court, California’s Fourth District Court of Appeal substantively altered the wage and hour landscape through its conclusion that California meal and rest period regulations only impose a passive obligation on employers to make breaks available.

Log In

Subscribers: Log in below to read the full story

Already subscribe but haven't registered for all the benefits of the website?

Subscribe

Click below to subscribe to
EMPLOYMENT LAW STRATEGIST

Subscribe

Pay-Per-View

You can purchase this article for $20.00
Click below

Purchase Article

ARTICLES FROM RELATED NEWSLETTERS

FRANCHISING BUSINESS & LAW ALERT

Franchising in Russia

While international franchising always brings a host of issues and complications, importation of franchise concepts into Russia highlights some critical issues and some lessons for international franchising in a broader context.

FRANCHISING BUSINESS & LAW ALERT

Are Franchisors 'Employers'?

Part One of this article analyzed what recent court and NLRB decisions are saying about the franchisor/franchisee employment question. The discussion continues herein.

COMMERCIAL LEASING LAW & STRATEGY

The Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Under U.S. Law

When circumstances change, parties to an agreement often find that the agreement does not cover the exact situation they are now facing. Instead, depending on how their contract is interpreted, one of the parties may be able to take advantage of the contractual silence or ambiguity and act in a way that causes detriment to the other.