February 2010
Class Litigation of Meal and Rest Period Claims
May Meal and Rest Period Claims Be Certified in a Post-Brinker World?
By Matt C. Bailey
In Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court, California’s Fourth District Court of Appeal substantively altered the wage and hour landscape through its conclusion that California meal and rest period regulations only impose a passive obligation on employers to make breaks available.
Log In
Subscribers: Log in below to read the full story
Already subscribe but haven't registered for all the benefits of the website?
Subscribe
Click below to subscribe to
EMPLOYMENT LAW & STRATEGY
Pay-Per-View
You can purchase this article for $20.00
Click below
Follow us