Law Journal Newsletters

An ALM Website

FRANCHISING BUSINESS & LAW ALERT

December 2012

Vicarious Liability: A Continuing Enigma

By By Rupert M. Barkoff

The recent California decision in Patterson v. Domino’s Pizza, LLC, suggests that a franchisor should never feel confident that it is fully protected against vicarious liability claims, even with layers of insurance.

Log In

Subscribers: Log in below to read the full story

Already subscribe but haven't registered for all the benefits of the website?

Subscribe

Click below to subscribe to
FRANCHISING BUSINESS & LAW ALERT

Subscribe

Pay-Per-View

You can purchase this article for $20.00
Click below

Purchase Article

ARTICLES FROM RELATED NEWSLETTERS

INSURANCE COVERAGE LAW BULLETIN

UPDATE -- Blurred Lines

In the March 2014 issue, in their article titled “Blurred Lines,” the authors discussed a number of decisions from various jurisdictions concerning the applicability of the attorney-client privilege and work-product doctrine in the context of an insurer's claims investigation. Among those decisions was National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. TransCanada Energy USA, Inc.

THE CORPORATE COUNSELOR

How Privileged Are Your Privileged Communications?

Corporate counsel may be surprised to learn that, under certain circumstances, plaintiffs in shareholder litigation have gained access to privileged materials upon a showing of "good cause" under the fiduciary exception. This article discusses the basis for the fiduciary exception, the factors involved in the good-cause analysis, and the circumstances under which courts have turned over privileged materials to plaintiffs.