December 2012
Henkel (Almost) 10 Years Later
Recent Decisions on the Assignability of ‘Occurrence’-Based Insurance Rights After Injury or Damage
By Seth A. Tucker and Charles Fischette
The meaning of "anti-assignment" clauses has been hotly disputed since 2003, when the California Supreme Court interpreted the clause in a manner that restricted the transfer of coverage rights in certain corporate transactions. This article examines how other courts have resolved the anti-assignment issue in the last decade.
Log In
Subscribers: Log in below to read the full story
Already subscribe but haven't registered for all the benefits of the website?
Subscribe
Click below to subscribe to
INSURANCE COVERAGE LAW BULLETIN
Pay-Per-View
You can purchase this article for $20.00
Click below
Follow us