Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In the 2005 Special Issue of Employment Law Strategist, we summarized key issues affecting employers following the Hurricane Katrina disaster, including the federal government’s legislative and regulatory responses to the catastrophe. The following is an updated summary of relevant legislative and regulatory actions.
Bush Administration Reinstates Davis-Bacon
On Sept. 8, 2005, President Bush suspended the Davis-Bacon Act prevailing wage requirements for reconstruction projects in the hurricane-battered Gulf Coast, declaring the situation a national emergency. The Bush Administration reinstated these prevailing wage requirements on Nov. 8. The Davis-Bacon Act requires federal construction contractors to pay locally prevailing wages, as determined by the Department of Labor, on all projects in excess of $2000. The law will apply ton all projects in the area that are subject to bid or awarded as of Nov. 8, 2005.
Department of Homeland Security Eases Work Rules for Certain Students
The Department of Homeland Security temporarily eased the work rules for some 5100 non-immigrant students who are enrolled in academic institutions located in areas affected by Hurricane Katrina. Effective Nov. 25, 2005, students were granted short-term employment authorizations, provided they satisfied a minimum coarse load requirement of six semester/quarter hours for undergraduates and three semester/quarter hours for graduate students. This change lifted the previous limitation of 20 hours per week of on-campus employment and 20 hours per week of off-campus employment. These relaxed regulations continued until Feb. 1, and were designed to provide relief to students so they could obtain short-term employment authorization and consequently reduce their course loads.
Enforcement Resumes on Affirmative Action Requirements for Hurricane Katrina Recovery
Effective Dec. 9, 2005, the Army Corp of Engineers resumed enforcing all affirmative action requirements for federal contractors on Hurricane Katrina-related projects, including the requirement that contractors develop written affirmative plans and file requisite reports. The reinstitution of affirmative action requirements also applies to non-construction contracts in the designated areas, including debris removal work. The exemption was granted to provide private companies that were not performing work for the federal government at that time with easier access to federal contracts during the Hurricane Katrina crisis.
The Department of Labor and the IRS Extend Deadlines on Health Plan Coverage
The Department of Labor (DOL) and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) are further extending the time to make decisions regarding health coverage for workers and employers affected by Hurricane Katrina. The time is extended from Jan. 3, 2006 until Feb. 28, 2006 to help participants, beneficiaries, qualified beneficiaries, and claimants directly affected by Hurricane Katrina who might encounter problems in exercising their health coverage portability or continuation coverage rights, or in the filing or perfecting of a benefit claim. With respect to any plan participant, beneficiary, qualified beneficiary, or claimant “directly affected” by Hurricane Katrina, benefit plans and health insurance issuers must disregard the period from Aug. 29, 2005 through Feb. 28, 2006 when determining any of the following time periods and dates:
*May exclude premium content
Looking Back and Looking Forward: Labor and Employment Trends for 2018
By Robert G. Brody and Alexander Friedman
President Trump had an eventful first year in the labor and employment arena. With his first year in office now wrapping up, this is a perfect time to look back at how the Trump Administration's policies have shaped labor and employment law issues at both the federal and state level, and where we expect to go in 2018.
Third Circuit's Paid Breaks Ruling a Bright Line, But Not an Open Door
By David Gialanella
A federal appeals court offered a clear rule earlier in 2017, in holding that employees must be paid for breaks lasting 20 minutes or less, but private suits on that issue have been few, and appear poised to remain so, practitioners say.
How to Avoid the Pitfalls of a Bad Sexual Harassment Policy
By Erin Mulvaney
How can companies make sure they have sexual harassment policies in place to protect interests and employees? The authors talked to several attorneys about common pitfalls and the lay of the land in the corporate environment right now. Here are highlights from those conversations.
Employee Claims in Bankruptcy Pose Significant Liability Exposure
By Shane G. Ramsey and David M. Barnes, Jr.
When a corporation determines to file for Chapter 11 protection, questions concerning the status of existing labor and employment agreements and viability of employee claims immediately arise. Indeed, there are litanies of potential pitfalls for companies that file for bankruptcy without strictly following the requirements of federal or state employment laws.