Follow Us

Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Commercial Law

Lender Beware: Ignore Suspicious Activity at Your Own Peril

Recently, the Seventh Circuit held that a lender who should have discovered that its borrower lacked authority to pledge assets is not protected by a good-faith defense to a fraudulent transfer action. Without this defense, the lender lost its security. Should the priority of the lender's claim should be further reduced through equitable subordination?

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

In Grede v. Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (In re Sentinel Management Group, Inc.), 809 F.3d 958 (7th Cir. Jan. 8, 2016), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that a lender who should have discovered that its borrower lacked authority to pledge assets is not protected by a good-faith defense to a fraudulent transfer action. Without this defense, the lender lost its security. Because the lender was left with an unsecured claim, the court also addressed the question of whether the priority of the lender’s claim should be further reduced through equitable subordination.

To continue reading,
become a free ALM digital reader

Benefits include:

*May exclude premium content

Read These Next