Follow Us

Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Cybersecurity E-Discovery General Counsel and In House Counsel Litigation Technology Media and Telecom

Legal Tech: e-Discovery: Judge Says ‘NO’ to Party’s Bid to Force Use of Predictive Coding

Would Judge Peck’s admiration and advocacy for predictive coding lead him, upon a request by the opposing party, to force a responding party to use it against that party’s own wishes? Judge Peck recently faced this issue, putting potential use of predictive coding at odds with established precedent and procedure regarding how to conduct discovery.

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Predictive coding, the use of computer algorithms and machine learning as part of document review, has been billed as the next generation of technology in e-discovery. For years, e-discovery service providers — along with some jurists and e-discovery industry veterans — have sung its praises as, at minimum, a complement to the standard document review process, and possibly as a replacement for it.

This premium content is locked for Cybersecurity Law & Strategy subscribers only

Continue reading by getting
started with a subscription.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN CYBERSECURITY, PRIVACY, INFORMATION GOVERNANCE, LEGAL TECHNOLOGY AND E-DISCOVERY.
  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on cyber threats, data breaches, and legal technology
  • Tap into expert guidance from top legal tech lawyers and experts

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Subscribe Now For Unlimited Access

Read These Next