Follow Us

Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Expert Witnesses Litigation Medical Malpractice

Do Daubert Motions Really Work?

Part One of a Three-Part Article

Among the concerns commonly expressed by the trial bar is the perception that so-called Daubert motions are a long shot at best, often not worth the time and effort. Two recent studies shed new light on these attitudes.

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

More than 20 years into the Daubert era, a surprising number of litigators still have doubts and disagreements about the effectiveness of motions in limine challenging the admissibility of federal court opinion testimony under Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) 702. Among the concerns commonly expressed by the trial bar is the perception that so-called Daubert motions are a long shot at best, often not worth the time and effort.

To continue reading,
become a free ALM digital reader

Benefits include:

*May exclude premium content

Read These Next