Follow Us

Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Intellectual Property Litigation Patent Litigation Regulation

Transactions Triggering the 35 USC §102 On-Sale Bar

Despite leaving unresolved the ambiguity about the effect of secret sales under §102, the Helsinn ruling offers clues to practitioners seeking to avoid the on-sale bar.

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently analyzed whether case law discussing the scope of the on-sale bar under 35 USC §102 as it stood prior to the America Invents Act (AIA) still applies to the revised §102 under the AIA. See, Helsinn v. Teva, No. 2016-1284, 2016-1787 (Fed. Cir. May 1, 2017). Despite leaving unresolved the ambiguity about the effect of secret sales under §102, the Helsinn ruling offers clues to practitioners seeking to avoid the on-sale bar.

This premium content is locked for The Intellectual Property Strategist subscribers only

Continue reading by getting
started with a subscription.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW PRACTITIONERS.
  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical analysis of developments in patent, copyright and trademark law
  • Tap into expert guidance from top intellectual property lawyers and experts

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Subscribe Now For Unlimited Access

Read These Next