Call 855-808-4530 or email GroupSales@alm.com to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Livingston Christian School (LCS) is a non-denominational religious school that had operated for a number of years. It sought to move to the nearby Township of Genoa, and rented space in a local church. The Town denied a special use permit that was required to operate the school. As a result of the denial, which was by a 4-3 vote, LCS brought an action claiming a violation of Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc et seq. The District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan awarded summary judgment to the town, and the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed in Livingston Christian Sch. v. Genoa Charter Twp., 858 F.3d 996, 998 (6th Cir. 2017). The decision of the court appears to fix a narrower standard in determining what constitutes a substantial burden on religious exercise under RLUIPA than had been followed in previous decisions.
By Lisa Clare Kombrink
The Appellate Division, Second Department, recently decided Long Island Pine Barrens Society, Inc. v. Suffolk County Legislature, an important case that pitted the interests of farmers and conservationists against a local advocacy group focused on open space and water quality.
Broker Agreed to Commission Based on Rent for First Five Years of Lease
Statements in Earlier Action Did Not Accelerate Mortgage and Trigger Statute of Limitations
Death Does Not Extend Foreclosure Limitations Period
Neighbor Granted Statutory Licence to Paint Fence
Record Did Not Establish Conveyance of Easement
Co-Tenant Entitled to Partition
Town Entitled To Injunctive Relief for Violation of Certificate of Occupancy
Guarantor May Not Interpose Wrongful Eviction Defense
Landlord Bound by Renewal Lease Signed After Judgment of Possession
Notice of Nonrewnal Sufficient to Withstand Jurisdictional Challenge
Incarcerated Son Not Entitled to Succession Rights
Occupant Did Not Establish Succession Rights
Court Dismisses Tortious Interference Claim By Holder of First Refusal Right