Follow Us

Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Legislation Litigation

The Consequences of Imperfect Foreclosure Affirmations

Where the borrower's default is not in dispute, the First Department appears to have recognized that there is little reason to delay the inevitable foreclosure. Discussion of a case in point.

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

An administrative order issued by the state’s chief judge requires counsel for a foreclosing mortgagee to prepare an affirmation establishing the factual accuracy of the documents on which the foreclosure action is based. When the mortgagor has conceded default on the mortgage, what perceived deficiencies in the affirmation preclude issuance of an order of reference and a judgment of foreclosure and sale? The First Department recently faced that issue in Bank of America v. Brannon, NYLJ 11/1/17, p. 22., col. 1, and the issue has also provoked litigation in the Second Department. The import of those cases appears to be that when the mortgagee substantially complies with the administrative order, the mortgagee will be entitled to proceed with the foreclosure.

This premium content is locked for New York Real Estate Law Reporter subscribers only

Continue reading by getting
started with a subscription.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN REAL ESTATE PRACTICE IN NEW YORK.
  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical analysis of significant real estate cases in New York
  • Tap into expert guidance from top real estate lawyers and experts

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Subscribe Now For Unlimited Access

Read These Next