Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Recently, federal courts across the country have ruled on insurers’ motions to bifurcate bad-faith litigation; i.e., motions to separate and stay discovery and/or the trial of the bad-faith claims from the insured’s claim for coverage. The most recent rulings in cases where insureds opposed bifurcation are mixed, but the majority appear to favor insureds and deny the carriers’ motions to bifurcate. For examples of cases denying bifurcation motions, see Wagner v. Allstate Ins. Co., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6364 (Jan. 19, 2016); Bitpay, Inc. v. Mass. Bay Ins. Co., ___ F.Supp. 3d ___, 2016 WL 1105263 (March 17, 2016); Brown v. Allstate Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 2015 WL 6739143 (M.D. Ala. Nov. 3, 2015). For examples of cases granting bifurcation motions, see Kermeen v. State Farm Ins. Co., 2015 WL 4727646 (D. Neb. Aug. 10, 2015); Holloway v. Ohio Sec. Ins. Co., 2015 WL 6870141 (W.D. Ky. Nov. 4, 2015).
Cyber Security Challenges and Potential Uninsured Exposures
This article provides a broad overview of cyber security challenges, and the insurance coverage (or lack thereof) for the financial impact of those cyber security challenges.
Fourth Circuit Finds GCL Insurer Owed Duty to Defend Cyber-Related Claims
This two-part article constitutes an overall review of ACC clauses in first-party property policies and their application across the United States. Most courts have found ACC clauses to be enforceable, although a handful of states have held that insurers may not contractually opt out of the state's causation doctrines, i.e. , efficient proximate cause or concurrent causation. We conclude the article herein.
Editor's NoteDear Readers: It is with the deepest regret that we must inform you that this issue of The Insurance Coverage Law Bulletin will be the last.…