Follow Us

Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Litigation Tax United States Supreme Court White Collar Crime

The Deductibility of FCA Payments in Light of Kokesh

A Business Expense?

In negotiating FCA or similar settlements with the government, one key consideration is the tax treatment of any payment. While not in the context of deductibility, the Supreme Court this year, inKokesh v. SEC, analyzed whether disgorgement in an SEC enforcement action was punitive or compensatory.

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

In negotiating False Claims Act (FCA) or similar settlements with the government, one key consideration is the tax treatment of any payment. While business expenses (including compensatory damages) may be deducted, deductions may not be taken for fines or penalties paid to the government for a legal violation or for payments made to the government to settle such potential liability. See 26 U.S.C. § 162(a), (f); 26 C.F.R. § 1.162-21. Taxpayers and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) have litigated the deductibility of settlement payments, with courts adopting differing approaches to determine if a payment is punitive and thus a nondeductible penalty.

This premium content is locked for Business Crimes Bulletin subscribers only

Continue reading by getting
started with a subscription.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS FOR WHITE-COLLAR CRIME AND REGULATORY PRACTITIONERS.
  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • All aspects of financial and white-collar crime are covered
  • Tap into expert guidance from top white-collar crime adn regulatory lawyers and experts

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Subscribe Now For Unlimited Access

Read These Next