Follow Us

Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Bankruptcy Litigation

Landmines In Bankruptcy Practice, Part II

By enforcing deadlines strictly, refusing to hear appeals from interlocutory orders, and rarely bypassing the district court for direct appeals, appellate courts have generally avoided what they view as unnecessary work and delay. But a few courts have made important exceptions in the past year.

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

This is the second article in a series describing the current bankruptcy appeals boom (see Part One here). Deadlines, leave to appeal and direct appeals are the subject. By enforcing deadlines strictly, refusing to hear appeals from interlocutory orders, and rarely bypassing the district court for direct appeals, appellate courts have generally avoided what they view as unnecessary work and delay. But a few courts have made important exceptions in the past year, as shown here. These courts have supplemented any gaps in the current Judicial Code and applicable rules. In later articles, we will discuss recent decisions covering appeals from fee awards, the finality doctrine, appellate jurisdiction, and appeals from arbitration awards.

This premium content is locked for The Bankruptcy Strategist subscribers only

Continue reading by getting
started with a subscription.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS FOR BANKRUPTCY LAW PRACTITIONERS.
  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • All aspects of bankruptcy law are covered
  • Tap into expert guidance from top bankruptcy lawyers

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Subscribe Now For Unlimited Access

Read These Next