Follow Us

Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Different State, Different Outcome: Medical Malpractice v. Common Law Negligence

Last month, we discussed a recent case in which CA's high court was asked to determine whether a lawsuit was properly pleaded as one for common law negligence, rather than medical malpractice. The answer was crucial to the parties, as it would determine whether the case could go to trial or must be dismissed. The article concludes herein with a look at a similar TN case.

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Last month, we discussed Flores v. Presbyterian Intercommunity Hospital, 2016 Cal. LEXIS 2561 (Cal. 5/5/16), a recent California case in which the state’s high court was asked to determine whether a lawsuit was properly pleaded as one for common law negligence, rather than medical malpractice. The answer was crucial to the parties, as it would determine whether the case could go to trial or must be dismissed. California’s Supreme Court dealt the plaintiff a blow when it sided with the defense to find that the case of the faulty bed rail did indeed sound in malpractice, and the claim must be dismissed because it was filed after the statute of limitations for medical malpractice actions had passed.

To continue reading,
become a free ALM digital reader

Benefits include:

*May exclude premium content

Read These Next