Follow Us

Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Bankruptcy Litigation

Expansion of the 'Barton' Doctrine To Unsecured Creditors' Committees

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently held in Blixseth v. Brown that under Barton v. Barbour, a plaintiff must obtain a bankruptcy court's permission before commencing a lawsuit in another forum against a member of the committee of unsecured creditors, and that Stern v. Marshall does not preclude bankruptcy courts from adjudicating such claims on the merits.

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently held in Blixseth v. Brown (In re Yellowstone Mountain Club, LLC), 841 F.3d 1090 (9th Cir. 2016), that under Barton v. Barbour, 104 U.S. 126 (1881), a plaintiff must obtain a bankruptcy court’s permission before commencing a lawsuit in another forum against a member of the committee of unsecured creditors, and that Stern v. Marshall, 564 U.S. 462 (2011) does not preclude bankruptcy courts from adjudicating such claims on the merits.

This premium content is locked for The Bankruptcy Strategist subscribers only

Continue reading by getting
started with a subscription.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS FOR BANKRUPTCY LAW PRACTITIONERS.
  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • All aspects of bankruptcy law are covered
  • Tap into expert guidance from top bankruptcy lawyers

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Subscribe Now For Unlimited Access

Read These Next