Law Journal Newsletters publishes 9 leading online and print newsletters aimed at the diverse needs of attorneys in a wide range of practice areas. Enhanced for Web and mobile devices, these publications are powerful, intuitive, in-depth and affordable. A professional staff of attorneys and seasoned editors discuss and analyze the latest trends, cases, precedents and rulings; often well before this information hits online media. Written by lawyers, for lawyers, each LJN newsletter brings you ongoing intelligence and forecasts by top experts practicing in their respective fields.
When AI Agents Trigger a Crisis: The New Communications Playbook
How do you communicate when you know the harm before you know its cause? For law firms, it comes up both when advising a client and when explaining an incident of their own.
The gap between what a firm bills and what it collects is not a collections failure. It is a design flaw in how the whole revenue cycle is wired, and clients armed with AI are now exploiting it faster than firms can respond.
As quantum machines become more powerful, today’s uncrackable encryption schemes may become trivial to break. Opinions vary as to how soon that moment, so-called “Q Day,” will arrive, but the threat is real.
This article surveys the contours of puffery across federal and state advertising law, examines where courts and the National Advertising Division (a unit of BBB National Programs, which provides a self-regulatory forum for advertising disputes) have drawn the line, and identifies practical takeaways for practitioners whose clients want to puff — but not too much.
The Copyright Royalty Board (CRB), which works under the umbrella of the Librarian of Congress, sets statutory-license royalty terms and rates. The U.S. Courts of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit recently issued two notable decisions about the CRB.
The Goldman Sachs decision may offer a path through the longstanding conflict: beyond asking whether a dispute is core, future courts may use the Supreme Court’s analysis in Stern to assess whether the dispute lies within the bankruptcy court’s constitutionally protected sphere of authority.
Two companion decisions issued by the Appellate Division, Second Department, on July 29, 2026, provide the clearest appellate guidance to date on the boundary between New York’s statewide cannabis licensing framework and local land-use authority to regulate cannabis dispensaries.
© Copyright 2026 ALM Global, LLC trading as Centellic.
Advertise with Us Customer Support Terms of Service Privacy Policy
