Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Gone are the days when a lawyer would print out documents and prepare a privilege log by drafting individual descriptions — one privileged document at a time. Leveraging the latest technological tools, today's e-data lawyers are as sophisticated and efficient in preparing privilege logs as they are in all other phases of discovery. Privilege-log planning should begin well before the first privileged document is logged. In fact, privilege-log strategy should be considered at the outset of a matter and included in early meet-and-confers with opposing counsel about the discovery process. In this article, we provide an overview of the different types of privilege logs; lay out best practices for negotiating ESI or privilege-log protocols; discuss what to do if an ESI or privilege-log protocol has not been entered in a matter; consider practical uses of technology to generate privilege logs; and address the inadvertent production of a privileged document.
Not all privilege logs are identical; they can vary widely in detail, scope and burden. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not use the term "log" or otherwise spell out logging procedures. Instead, Rule 26(b)(5)(A)(ii) requires a withholding party to "describe the nature" of withheld documents "in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable other parties to assess the claim." In the absence of clearly defined requirements, three types of privilege logs have emerged.
Traditional privilege logs contain an individualized description for the privilege asserted on each document and are universally accepted by courts. Technology can be leveraged to extract metadata for the objective fields in a traditional privilege log, but these logs require distinct descriptions for each logged document. While the distinct descriptions allow the receiving party to evaluate the privilege basis for each document, traditional privilege logs are burdensome to prepare in both time and expense, particularly in matters with large volumes of privileged documents. The burden of preparing a traditional log is not always proportional to the need, as not all withheld documents require privilege descriptions to adequately show the reason for the withholding. In addition to traditional logs, there are two alternative types of privilege logs. Metadata privilege logs are the most expedient and inexpensive of privilege logs, comprising an export of agreed-upon metadata that is available for logged documents in the review database.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.