Features
ALM Staff
&
Law Journal Newsletters
CALIFORNIA Alleged Conspiracy to Fix LCD Prices Yields Additional Indictments On June 10, 2010, the DOJ announced that additional charges had been filed in its long-running investigation into alleged price-fixing for panels used in a host of consumer electronics, including computer monitors, The panels, known as thin-film transistor-liquid crystal display panels (TFT-LCD), represented a worldwide market of $70 billion at the time the alleged conspiracy ended. …
Features
ALM Staff
&
Law Journal Newsletters
In-depth analysis of recent rulings.
Features
ALM Staff
&
Law Journal Newsletters
Review of an important case.
Features
ALM Staff
&
Law Journal Newsletters
Recent rulings of interest.
Features
Jeremy D. Morley
The U.S. Supreme Court has now issued its very first decision interpreting the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction.
Features
ALM Staff
&
Law Journal Newsletters
Rulings of importance to you and your practice.
Features
Douglas A. Cooper
&
Matthew F. Didora
In divorce, it is sometimes necessary to value shares of a closely held corporation. But there are stocks in privately held companies throughout New York whose shares are not traded on the NYSE or NASDAQ. These companies often have only a handful of shareholders, many of whom are family members or close friends.
Features
ALM Staff
&
Law Journal Newsletters
A roundup of recent developments.
Features
James J. ('J.') Ferrelli
&
Paul M. da Costa
On Feb. 2 of this year, the Supreme Court of New Jersey held that a foreign manufacturer of an industrial recycling machine is subject to New Jersey's long-arm jurisdiction under the stream-of-commerce theory. This has broad implications.
Features
Christopher D. Bernard
Last month, we discussed the fact that a defendant should be permitted to offer evidence that the plaintiff's injuries could have occurred in the absence of negligence. Conversely, the defendant should not be permitted to offer evidence that might lead a jury to improperly infer that the mere fact that a complication is a known risk of the procedure is evidence that the defendant was not negligent in causing that complication. The discussion concludes herein.
