Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Features

Coverage Issues Under Homeowners' Insurance Policies in Chinese Drywall Cases Image

Coverage Issues Under Homeowners' Insurance Policies in Chinese Drywall Cases

Travis B. Wilkinson & Seth A. Schmeeckle

Recently, a Louisiana Court of Appeal rendered a decision in what is believed to be the first state or federal appellate decision regarding insurance coverage for damages allegedly caused by Chinese drywall under a homeowners' insurance policy. In <i>Ross v. C. Adams Construction &amp; Design</i>, the Louisiana Fifth Circuit affirmed the granting of a summary judgment in favor of the defendant insurer and held that the claims made by the plaintiff homeowners for damages as a result of Chinese drywall in their home were excluded from coverage.

September issue in PDF format Image

September issue in PDF format

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

&#133;

IP News Image

IP News

Howard J. Shire & Joseph Mercadante

Highlights of the latest intellectual property news from around the country.

Features

Real Property Law Image

Real Property Law

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

An in-depth look at several major rulings.

Features

Landlord & Tenant Image

Landlord & Tenant

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

A look at a recent ruling.

Development Image

Development

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Two key rulings are discussed.

Features

Cooperatives & Condominiums Image

Cooperatives & Condominiums

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Recent rulings of importance.

MERS Standing: Its Impact on Title Insurance Image

MERS Standing: Its Impact on Title Insurance

Marvin N. Bagwell

Two recent decisions that greatly affected title insurers on the issue of standing for all foreclosing lenders and of MERS in particular.

Features

Myriad Genetics Image

Myriad Genetics

Darren Donnelly

On July 29, 2011, the Federal Circuit handed down its decision in <i>Ass'n for Molecular Pathology et al. v. U.S.P.T.O.</i>, (often referred to as the "<i>Myriad Genetics</i> gene patent" case). The divided panel's three opinions reveal areas of broad agreement and notable disagreement about patent eligibility under 35 U.S.C. ' 101 of several categories of patent claims of interest to life sciences industries.

Features

Decisions of Interest Image

Decisions of Interest

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Key rulings of importance are analyzed.

Need Help?

  1. Prefer an IP authenticated environment? Request a transition or call 800-756-8993.
  2. Need other assistance? email Customer Service or call 1-877-256-2472.

MOST POPULAR STORIES

  • "Holy Fair Use, Batman": Copyright, Fair Use and the Dark Knight
    The copyright for the original versions of Winnie the Pooh and Mickey Mouse have expired. Now, members of the public can create — and are busy creating — their own works based on these beloved characters. Suppose, though, we want to tell stories using Batman for which the copyright does not expire until 2035. We'll review five hypothetical works inspired by the original Batman comic and analyze them under fair use.
    Read More ›
  • Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
    This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
    Read More ›
  • The Stranger to the Deed Rule
    In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.
    Read More ›