Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Features

ERRATUM Image

ERRATUM

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

In an article that appeared in the September 2008 issue, <i>Measuring Realization to Improve Firm Profits</i> by K. Jennie Kinnevy, the author's biography was inadvertently omitted.

Unreasonable Compensation to PC Shareholders: The IRS Gains a Victory Image

Unreasonable Compensation to PC Shareholders: The IRS Gains a Victory

James D. Cotterman

The general view has been that unreasonable compensation claims against shareholder employees of professional corporations was not an issue. In <i>Pediatric Surgical Associates P.C. v. Commissioner</i>, the Tax Court determined that compensation paid to the shareholder physicians was unreasonably high because it exceeded the value of the services performed. Many law firm professional corporations could face this same issue.

Partner Care Image

Partner Care

Nancy Regan & Stanley Kolodziejczak

In an ever-increasing competitive environment, it becomes more and more difficult for law firms to distinguish themselves from their competitors. A quick scan of some of the better-known firm Web sites shows that many firms often look and sound alike. However, it is the quality and caliber of the attorneys that set the firms apart. Saying you're distinctive is much easier than proving it to the marketplace, your partners and staff. One area in which your firm can build distinction and establish itself as a leader is Partner Care.

Features

Section 79 Planning Opportunities Image

Section 79 Planning Opportunities

Lawrence L. Bell, Theodore J. Zouzounis & Stephen M. (Pete) Peterson

Closely held businesses produce over 50% of the Gross National Product ("GNP"). Less than 50% of these businesses have a continuation plan and almost one-third of these companies (29%) use a buy-sell arrangement to assist in their planning. Buy-Sell agreements are very simple tools that over the years have grown to meet increasing needs of closely held businesses.

News Briefs Image

News Briefs

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

The latest news from the franchising world.

Features

Court Watch Image

Court Watch

Darryl A. Hart

CA Supreme Court: No 'Narrow Restraint' Exception to Prohibition on Covenants Not to Compete

Franchisors May Have Standing to Seek to Quash Subpoenas Directed to Third Parties Image

Franchisors May Have Standing to Seek to Quash Subpoenas Directed to Third Parties

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

What can a franchisor do if some of its franchisees or business partners (who are not parties to the litigation) are slapped with broad and burdensome subpoenas from disgruntled franchisees or potential franchisees in litigation? In many cases, the answer may be nothing. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure generally do not allow a party to seek to enforce the rights of others (many states have analogous rules, as well).

Canadians Tackle Disclosure Documents and Other Franchise Mysteries Image

Canadians Tackle Disclosure Documents and Other Franchise Mysteries

Paul Jones

In Canada, franchise disclosure documents ('FDDs') are not reviewed by any government agency. It is up to the franchisor to prepare and deliver the document correctly, failing which the franchisee can, for a limited period of time, send in a rescission notice.

Rules of Thumb to Rein in Litigation Costs and Optimize Results Image

Rules of Thumb to Rein in Litigation Costs and Optimize Results

Stewart Weltman

This is the fifth and final entry in a series of articles discussing how in-house counsel can better manage litigation matters.

Canada: What Are the Rules in Ontario's 'Neverland'? Image

Canada: What Are the Rules in Ontario's 'Neverland'?

Markus Cohen

The Canada-based, Louisiana-flavored B'ton Rouge franchise system features ribs, beef, and fish in a casual-dining atmosphere, with about 20 franchised restaurants operating in Qu'bec and Ontario. One of the Ontario locations is the battleground for the case to be outlined in this article: <i>4287975 Canada Inc. v. Imvescor Restaurants Inc. et. al.</i>

Need Help?

  1. Prefer an IP authenticated environment? Request a transition or call 800-756-8993.
  2. Need other assistance? email Customer Service or call 1-877-256-2472.

MOST POPULAR STORIES

  • INTERVIEW
    In this exclusive interview with International Franchise Association (IFA) chairman Steve Siegel, Associate Editor Kevin Adler, asks about policy priorities for 2003, and other legislative and regulatory developments that affect the franchise industry.
    Read More ›
  • Landlord & Tenant Law
    Questions of Fact About Whether Tenant Exercised Renewal Option Hearing Necessary to Determine Whether Landlord Can Remove Tenant to Complete Restoration Work Questions of Fact About Landlord Fraud Additional Security Deposit Constitutes Source of Income Discrimination
    Read More ›