Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Negotiating to Make Rain

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Research suggests that women are excellent at negotiating for others. They are not as good at negotiating for themselves. Similarly, women lawyers tend to lag behind men in developing business. Indeed, many abhor the prospect of making rain almost as much as the prospect of advocating for themselves. Yet the reality is that women who wish to make partner must also make rain.

Features

Attorney Telecommuting

Jeffrey P. Ayres

Telecommuting is all the rage in many sectors of our economy. With increasing regularity, lawyers and their firms alike are participating in this trend. Modern technology is a wonderful thing, and telecommuting permits firms (law and other types) to spread their tentacles into far-off uncharted waters. For attorneys and law firms, is telecommuting a bridge over troubled waters, or a long walk on a short pier? That is the question I address in this article.

Decisions of Interest

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Recent rulings of importance to you and your practice.

NJ and CT News

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Find out what's happening in neighboring states.

Features

Jailed Inmates Have Parental Rights Too

Janice G. Inman

When a man is in jail, it may be very difficult for him to keep in meaningful contact with his child unless he has the aid of concerned family members or friends. Apart from the emotional problems that may ensue for all parties if visits and phone calls are nonexistent or sporadic, the issue of meaningful contact becomes even more urgent when someone ' the child's mother, another relative or a social services agency ' wants the child freed for adoption.

Applying College Credits in Divorce Cases

Elena L. Greenberg

As complicated as the selection and financing process has become for divorcing parents with children about to enter college, matrimonial lawyers also are faced with similar complexities in negotiating terms to define the parents' respective contributions for college expenses. In particular, courts have addressed the issues of giving a noncustodial parent a credit for college expenses paid by him or her as against the overall basic child support payments. But there is little help in drafting the language in a written agreement the parties can readily understand and apply.

Expert Witness vs. Trial Consultant

Jeffrey P. Wittmann

The field of forensic psychology as applied to Family and Supreme Court matters involving custody and access issues has evolved in its complexity and breadth over the last three decades to encompass a broader range of professional activities. The forensic psychology literature has begun to provide more specific guidance regarding the 'do's and don't's' of both expert witness work and trial consultancy.

Litigation

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Recent rulings of importance to you and your practice.

Features

Practical Tips for Negotiating Settlement in Matrimonial Cases

Lynne Strober & David S. Carton

To negotiate a matrimonial case successfully, the practitioner must zigzag through a litany of impediments. These include the facts of the case, the relevant law, as well as the adversary and client, both of whom come with their own personalities, priorities and quirks. This two-part article (Part Two will appear in the April 2008 Issue) is offered as a guide to settling matrimonial cases.

Formal Recognition of Gay and Lesbian Relationships

Mark Johnson

According to the Human Rights Campaign, 26 states have adopted constitutional provisions limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples. Nineteen states have enacted similar statutory restrictions. Meanwhile, ten states and the District of Columbia have adopted varying levels of legal protection for same-sex couples and their children. While only one American jurisdiction allows same-sex couples to marry, at least five countries worldwide, including Canada, do so. Much is hazy in this legal landscape, but one thing is clear: In the short term, sister-state recognition of these relationships will be spotty at best, and will be fought out on a case-by-case basis.

Need Help?

  1. Prefer an IP authenticated environment? Request a transition or call 800-756-8993.
  2. Need other assistance? email Customer Service or call 1-877-256-2472.

MOST POPULAR STORIES

  • Surveys in Patent Infringement Litigation: The Next Frontier
    Most experienced intellectual property attorneys understand the significant role surveys play in trademark infringement and other Lanham Act cases, but relatively few are likely to have considered the use of such research in patent infringement matters. That could soon change in light of the recent admission of a survey into evidence in <i>Applera Corporation, et al. v. MJ Research, Inc., et al.</i>, No. 3:98cv1201 (D. Conn. Aug. 26, 2005). The survey evidence, which showed that 96% of the defendant's customers used its products to perform a patented process, was admitted as evidence in support of a claim of inducement to infringe. The court admitted the survey into evidence over various objections by the defendant, who had argued that the inducement claim could not be proven without the survey.
    Read More ›
  • In the Spotlight
    On May 9, 2003, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Massachusetts announced that Bayer Corporation, the pharmaceutical manufacturer, had been sentenced and ordered to pay a criminal fine of $5,590,800 stemming from its earlier plea of guilty to violating the Federal Prescription Drug Marketing Act by failing to list with the FDA its drug product, Cipro, that was privately labeled for an HMO. Such listing is required under the federal Food, Drug &amp; Cosmetic Act. The Federal Prescription Drug Marketing Act, Pub. L. 100-293, enacted on April 22, 1988, as modified on August 26, 1992 by the Prescription Drug Amendments (PDA) Pub. L. 102-353, 106 Stat. 941, amended sections 301, 303, 503, and 801 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, codified at 21 U.S.C. '' 331, 333, 353, 381, to establish requirements for distributing prescription drug samples.
    Read More ›