Features
Case Notes
Highlights of the latest product liability cases from around the country.
Recalled Mattel Toys: Class Action Suits Seek Medical Monitoring
Two Pennsylvania law firms have filed class action suits against toy company Mattel Inc. The suits were filed in an effort to compel Mattel, the importer of millions of Chinese-made toys that have been recalled recently due to lead paint and small magnets, to pay for lead testing for children who may have been affected by the toys.
Fee Contracts: Failure to Include Language Costs Millions
The saga of a Texas product liability law firm can serve as a lesson to other firms in Texas, and perhaps, throughout the nation. In September, an arbitration panel ordered John M. O'Quinn's firm to pay a class of 3,450 former breast implant clients nearly $42 million because the fee contracts did not include language permitting the firm to charge for general expenses.
Texas Asbestos Reform: The New Quantitative Standard
Because of the devastating impact asbestos litigation has had on U.S. companies, courts and legislatures have finally begun to retake control of asbestos litigation. On June 8, 2007, the Texas Supreme Court issued its opinion in <i>Borg-Warner Corporation v. Flores</i>, marking the latest step in Texas' transition away from easy asbestos verdicts for plaintiffs.
The Fifth Element: Adding to the Daubert Criteria
Any trial lawyer re-reading <i>Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,</i> or reading afresh the Ninth Circuit's application of the <i>Daubert</i> standard on remand from the U.S. Supreme Court may be surprised to learn that a fifth reliability element ' often overlooked ' is frequently applicable and very useful.
Recent Developments in Spoliation Law
This article examines recent developments in spoliation law affecting civil litigation, including various remedial and punitive strategies that some jurisdictions have adopted.
Features
Practice Tip: Is It Necessary to Sue a Foreign Auto Manufacturer?
Foreign auto manufacturers often have American subsidiaries that import their products and market them with a warranty from the importer. If such a product injures an American due to a design defect, do you need to sue the manufacturer as well as the importer/seller/warrantor?
The Leasing Hotline
Highlights of the latest commercial leasing cases from around the country.
Features
Subleasing Pointers: The Perspective of a Prime Landlord, Sublandlord, and Subtenant
Part One of this series discussed subleasing from the perspective of the Prime Landlord. This second installment addresses the issue from the Sublandlord's perspective.
Need Help?
- Prefer an IP authenticated environment? Request a transition or call 800-756-8993.
- Need other assistance? email Customer Service or call 1-877-256-2472.
MOST POPULAR STORIES
- Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright LawsThis article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.Read More ›
- "Holy Fair Use, Batman": Copyright, Fair Use and the Dark KnightThe copyright for the original versions of Winnie the Pooh and Mickey Mouse have expired. Now, members of the public can create — and are busy creating — their own works based on these beloved characters. Suppose, though, we want to tell stories using Batman for which the copyright does not expire until 2035. We'll review five hypothetical works inspired by the original Batman comic and analyze them under fair use.Read More ›
- Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.Read More ›
- Removing Restrictive Covenants In New YorkIn Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?Read More ›