Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Features

Med Mal News Image

Med Mal News

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

The latest happenings.

Features

Apology Programs Are Hot News Image

Apology Programs Are Hot News

Linda S. Crawford

There has been a great deal of publicity in the medical community about apology programs ' programs that encourage doctors to affirmatively admit medical mistakes to patients and their families. While there is a lot of support for the idea, there is also a good deal of controversy over whether these programs actually work to reduce litigation and the cost of medical malpractice claims. What, realistically, can apology programs do ' and what can they not do?

Features

Court Clears Disclosure of Doctor Peer Reviews Image

Court Clears Disclosure of Doctor Peer Reviews

Pamela A. MacLean

Confidential physician peer reviews may be disclosed to plaintiffs in federal discrimination and antitrust cases in three federal circuits, even though all 50 states and the District of Columbia recognize a privilege against disclosure of the performance ratings. This growing federal-state divergence will make federal courts more attractive to plaintiffs filing civil rights suits involving doctors, attorneys say. At the same time, it may have a chilling effect on peer review participant candor and on the ability of health care facilities to recruit peer review team members.

Telemedicine, Pharmaceuticals and the License to Practice Image

Telemedicine, Pharmaceuticals and the License to Practice

Janice G. Inman

When a patient receives substandard care from a health care provider practicing telemedicine from a different state, the question is presented: Which state has jurisdiction over the transactions? The answer to this will depend on the two (or more) states involved and the circumstances of the case, but in the civil context it will generally come down to the usual questions of 'minimum contacts,' the parties' expectations, etc. What happens, though, when local prosecutors wants to hold a practitioner in another state criminally liable for practicing medicine within their state?

August issue in PDF format Image

August issue in PDF format

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

'

Features

News Briefs Image

News Briefs

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Highlights of the latest franchising news from around the country.

Court Watch Image

Court Watch

Joshua G. Galante

Highlights of the latest franchising cases from around the country.

Litigation Image

Litigation

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Recent rulings of interest to you and your practice.

Features

The Role of Existing Insurance Trusts in Divorce Image

The Role of Existing Insurance Trusts in Divorce

Martin M. Shenkman

Life insurance is a common issue addressed in a substantial proportion of divorces. For many clients, especially those of greater economic means, existing insurance coverage is owned by irrevocable life insurance trusts ('ILIT'). Existing ILIT arrangements too often receive inadequate attention during the course of a divorce as a result of the focus on other more significant issues, or the presumption that since the ILIT is 'irrevocable,' it cannot be tailored to address the post-divorce insurance needs. This can be a considerable mistake. In many cases, because it is assumed that an existing ILIT cannot be changed, the insurance requirements resulting from the divorce are separately addressed in a property settlement agreement ('PSA').

Features

The Ninth Circuit Strikes Again: Unconscionability and Arbitration Agreements on the West Coast Image

The Ninth Circuit Strikes Again: Unconscionability and Arbitration Agreements on the West Coast

C. Griffith Towle

In a recent decision, the Ninth Circuit revisited the thorny issues involving the doctrine of unconscionability and its application to arbitration agreements. In <i>Davis v. O'Melveny &amp; Myers</i>, 485 F.3d 1066 (9th. Cir. 2007), the court relied on a number of relatively recent, and by now well-known, cases in finding that a mandatory arbitration provision in O'Melveny's employee dispute resolution materials was unconscionable and, therefore, unenforceable.

Need Help?

  1. Prefer an IP authenticated environment? Request a transition or call 800-756-8993.
  2. Need other assistance? email Customer Service or call 1-877-256-2472.

MOST POPULAR STORIES

  • Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
    This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
    Read More ›
  • Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
    Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
    Read More ›
  • The Stranger to the Deed Rule
    In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.
    Read More ›