Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Bit Parts

Stan Soocher

Copyright Infringement/Motion to Intervene; Copyright Infringement/Striking Similarity; Right of Publicity/Attorney Fees.

Features

Celebrity Name or Likeness

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

A new department centering on key cases.

Clause & Effect

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan decided that unresolved issues of fact as to whether a distributor or a record label abandoned a record-distribution agreement precluded summary judgment for either party on breach claims by the distributor.

Features

Counsel Concerns

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

The U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada granted summary judgment in part for Nevada-based entertainment attorney John Mason on his claim of breach of legal-services agreements by a film-production company.

Practice Notes

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

What's happening at the top firms.

Features

'New' Summit Structure Retains Distribution Fees

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Summit Entertainment's $1 billion movie financing deal ' which created a new production and distribution studio ' all started with a group of bankers and lawyers sitting around and talking about how to get more money from movie-financing deals. In recent years, investors have invested in films that are distributed by studios, which take a distribution fee of about 10% to 15%. With the Summit deal, the investors for the first time cut the middleman in this process.

Cameo Clips

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Digital Downloading/No Public Performance; Management Agreements/Tortious Interference.

Features

Decision of Note: Mexican TV Co. Can Proceed in Florida Fed Court

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit decided that a Florida federal district court, rather than a Mexican court, should hear a suit by one Spanish-language broadcaster against another for tortious interference with a soap-opera actor's contract.

Supreme Court Re-Invigorates 'Obviousness': KSR v. Teleflex Decision

Benjamin Hershkowitz

On April 30, 2007, Justice Anthony Kennedy delivered a unanimous decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in <i>KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.</i>, reversing the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ('Federal Circuit') and, in effect, re-invigorating obviousness under 35 U.S.C. &sect;103 as an available defense to a patent.

Trademark Fair-Use Analysis Hits Snag

Steven M. Weinberg

Few issues in trademark and advertising law can compete in importance with this: whether a competitor can use another's trademark in advertising its products or services. With the battle for consumer attention growing increasingly aggressive as the number of products and services proliferate, and the means for advertising and promoting them expanding at an even more alarming rate, the importance of brands and their recognition by consumers ' and the surrounding legal issues ' have never been more significant.

Need Help?

  1. Prefer an IP authenticated environment? Request a transition or call 800-756-8993.
  2. Need other assistance? email Customer Service or call 1-877-256-2472.

MOST POPULAR STORIES