Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

National Litigation Hotline

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Recent rulings you need to know.

Features

Employment Agreements and Severance

Rory D. Lyons

Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code was enacted on Oct. 22, 2004 in an effort to regulate executive pay practices through the federal tax system. Failure to account for ' 409A's impact can seriously and adversely affect the economics of employment agreements, severance agreements, and other similar plans or other arrangements providing for a deferral of compensation. Consequently, this article details how ' 409A applies to these arrangements.

Features

Social Security Mismatch Letters

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

On June 14 of this year, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published for comment in the Federal Register proposed rules outlining recommended procedures for employers to follow in response to receiving Social Security mismatch notices. In promulgating the proposed rules, DHS outlined a new enforcement position ' namely, that no-match letters are relevant evidence that can put employers on notice about the immigration status of employees.

Sprinting Toward a Brick Wall

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

The Baby-Boomer generation entered the practice of law in unprecedented numbers, carrying lofty expectations and the collective willpower to engender unprecedented billable hours. Now this tsunami of active lawyers is moving toward senior status, phase-down and retirement. Despite the complex emotions engendered by retirement, the Baby-Boomer generation of lawyers ' and the law firms in which they have participated or help build ' <i>must</i> plan their future.

Features

Workplace Privacy

Lisa J. Sotto & Elisabeth M.McCarthy

Last month, we discussed HIPAA, Security Breach Notification Laws, and Safeguarding Personal Information. We conclude with a brief analysis of electronic privacy issues.

The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act

Christopher Hitchcock & Amber W. Locklear

In a recent decision written by Judge Richard Posner, The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit determined that the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) may be used to bring a private cause of action against a former employee who permanently erased confidential data from his company-issued laptop before returning it to the company. <i>International Airport Centers, L.L.C. v. Citrin</i>, (Slip Op.) No. 05-1522 (7th Cir. March 8, 2006). In so holding, the Seventh Circuit has joined the current tide of federal courts that have permitted companies to use the CFAA as a means with which to defend themselves against the malicious and competitive acts of departing employees.

Real Property Law

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

A review of an important case.

Features

Landlord & Tenant

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Recent rulings of importance to you and your practice.

Features

Development

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Recent cases and expert analysis.

Features

Cooperatives & Condominiums

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

The latest cases for your review.

Need Help?

  1. Prefer an IP authenticated environment? Request a transition or call 800-756-8993.
  2. Need other assistance? email Customer Service or call 1-877-256-2472.

MOST POPULAR STORIES