Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Features
Recent rulings of interest to you and your practice.
With this year's June 30 deadline for the Foreign Bank Account Reports (FBAR) fast approaching, it's worth considering the federal government's increased attention to the FBAR rules. Though criminal and civil enforcement relating to persons failing to comply with FBAR reporting requirements has been rare, the IRS (now the agency principally responsible for FBAR compliance) appears to be gearing up to investigate and prosecute willful violators. This new emphasis, together with the IRS's ever-expanding ability to obtain once secret information from foreign jurisdictions, suggests that we will be seeing more investigations and prosecutions in this area.
A recent decision by a Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel rejected the prevailing standard for authenticating electronically stored records and imposed stringent requirements that may help defend against computerized evidence in a broad range of cases, including white-collar prosecutions. In re: Vinhnee, 2005 WL 3609376 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. Dec. 16, 2005). Although decisions of the Panel, which consists of three bankruptcy judges, are binding precedent only for bankruptcy courts in the Ninth Circuit, Vinhnee's persuasive analysis has the potential to change the use of electronic evidence in other courts.
Is your handbook truly up to date? One of the points in the employment relationship where the employer can best position itself to achieve its business objectives is in the setting of policy ' a process in which the law affords employers broad latitude. A properly drafted policy manual can help foreclose or limit a lawsuit, and a manual that is prepared or updated carelessly can serve as the foundation for a legal claim. Here are several ways to tell at a glance whether your organization has postured itself to best advantage.
Features
Companies battling competitors may ask how to get a competitor criminally investigated. Two issues appear: Is this a good idea? If 'yes,' how do you do it effectively?
Features
Highlights of the latest commercial leasing cases from around the country.
In Part One, the authors summarized the SEC's proposal to revamp the rules governing the disclosure of executive and director compensation. They focused on the proposal's treatment of current compensation. Part Two picks up with a look at outstanding equity interests, covers post-employment and other types of compensation and benefits, and also discusses other effects of the proposal on corporate counsel.
Features
To the typical tenant, being located near or adjacent to vertical and horizontal transportation, which may include elevators, escalators, stairways, people movers, and similar transportation, would be a beneficial situation due to the customer traffic that such devices provide. However, several issues or potential issues arise when addressing the presence of vertical and horizontal transportation within the common areas of an enclosed regional shopping center. In particular, the following issues should be negotiated: accessibility and visibility; the right to relocate or close such transportation; and the right to substitute various means of vertical and horizontal transportation systems. This two-part article addresses these issues and provides sample model clauses for vertical and horizontal transportation.
We want to know how we can make this newsletter an even better resource for your professional needs. Are we covering all you want to see? Are there sections you would like to see enhanced or replaced?<br>Your views and opinions are essential in our effort to continue to provide you with the top notch News, Strategy and Analysis you have come to expect from Law Journal Newsletters.<br>Help us help you! Please click <a href="http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=604771980045">here</a> to complete a short survey or type the following URL into your browser: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=604771980045.<br>Your answers will assist us in making this an even better newsletter for you! Thank you.<br>Regards,<br>Colin Graf<br>LJN Marketing Director
Features
The term 'joint venture' encompasses a wide range of business combinations, some of which are simply contractual agreements between independent parties, others of which involve the creation of new entities through consolidation, and some of which involve both integration and contractual agreements. Because joint ventures comprise such a diverse array of business structures, they often defy easy characterization for antitrust purposes: Is a venture best viewed as a merger? A price-fixing agreement? Something in between? This characterization problem contributed to significant confusion in the courts over the proper scope of antitrust liability for joint ventures. <br>At one time, courts routinely declared unlawful a variety of joint ventures, many of which were plainly pro-competitive. The Supreme Court's decision in <i>Texaco, Inc. v. Dagher</i>, clarifies the application of the antitrust laws to joint ventures, and narrows the scope of potential liability for these types of business combinations.