Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Features
With increasingly longer military leaves (since 2001, the National Guard's deployment policy has shifted from a 6-month to a 24-month maximum service overseas), companies must understand their legal obligations under military leave laws, specifically the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA). Employers must be aware of what happens before, during and after their employees take military leave.
Features
In a February <i>A&FP</i> article titled 'Associate Overcompensation?' I ventured the opinion that competition for the most promising new associates was perhaps needlessly intense, given that law firms aren't very good at identifying which law school graduates actually will turn into excellent lawyers. The following interesting report seems to invite essentially the same question with regard to law student summer associates.
As analyzed in several <i>A&FP</i> articles, a major strategic goal of many law firms is to attain and maintain dominance for specific practice areas in a legal market. One downside of dominance in a practice area, however, is that a firm may increasingly need to turn away work in other practice areas due to client conflicts.<br>From the following excerpts of recent news analyses from <i>A&FP</i>'s ALM affiliates, it seems reasonable to conjecture that conflict-related attorney movements between firms help maintain a healthy level of competition in legal services that excessive dominance might otherwise undermine.
<i>A&FP</i> articles in March and April discussed how various 'boilerplate' clauses in a commercial lease may one-sidedly favor the landlord or tenant. The present article emphasizes the need to ensure that the force majeure clause in particular protects vital interests in the event of a major catastrophe. Whether your firm is a tenant or landlord, you'll want to take a close look, first at this article and then at your lease.
Industry analysts often debate implementation details of various standards, but more critical attention should be focused on whether entire standardization programs are well conceived. This article offers some lines of thought that readers may find useful in deciding their overall response to a standardization proposal.
Features
National rulings you need to know.
Features
Former SEC Chairman William H. Donaldson noted in a March 5, 2004 speech that SOX was needed to deal with 'a general erosion of standards of integrity and ethics in the corporate and financial world ... The acquiescence by the gatekeepers, like accountants, who turned their backs or actually condoned such accounting manipulation, combined with stock option incentives to management, fueled the short-term focus.' Ironically, the SEC and the Department of Justice, which enforce SOX's criminal provisions, appear ready to burden the traditional ethical obligations of corporate legal counselors to keep client communications confidential in an effort to police the integrity and ethics of other corporate gatekeepers.
Features
Notwithstanding the continuing reliance of federal courts on the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, they recognize that Congress did not intend to weaken the plea bargaining system when it enacted the Sentencing Reform Act. Given the formulaic nature of the guidelines, plea bargaining may be the best way to secure the most advantageous result for a client facing federal criminal charges. One bargaining tool is for defense counsel to suggest that his client plead to an alternative charge, such as misprision of a felony, 18 U.S.C. ' 4.
What changes did the Sentencing Commission make last year? Several general themes emerge. First, the Sentencing Commission attempted to create responsibility and more direct accountability on the part of corporate management for the existence and operation of a compliance and ethics program. Second, the Sentencing Commission created some specific responsibilities, in respect of the compliance and ethics program, for the 'governing authority' of the entity, which for a corporation is the board of directors. Third, the Sentencing Commission clarified that training is a mandatory means by which to 'communicate ... its standards and procedures' to all employees, including directors and management, and, as appropriate, third-party agents. This article examines those themes in greater detail.
