Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Features

The Class Action Fairness Act: The Meaning of 'Commenced' After 1 Year

Lianne S. Pinchuk

The Class Action Fairness Act ('CAFA') was enacted almost a year and a half ago, signed into law by President Bush on Feb. 18, 2005. 28 U.S.C. §1332(d)(2). CAFA was enacted to help control the 'explosion' in the number of class actions while still allowing the right of access to the courts. As stated by one of the act's proponents, Sen. Orin Hatch, during his keynote address to the American Bar Association conference on class actions, 'truly national class actions should not be heard in remote state courts with little tie to any of the parties involved.' CAFA attempts to rectify this situation by allowing national class actions to be heard in federal courts.

Features

News Briefs

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Highlights of the latest franchising news from around the country.

Real Property Law

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Analysis of the latest cases.

Features

Landlord & Tenant

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

The latest court rulings.

Features

Development

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Recent rulings of interest.

Court Watch

Rupert Barkoff & Kitt Shipe

Highlights of the latest franchising cases from around the country.

Index

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Easy-to-read listing of everything contained in this issue.

The Effect of Zoning Amendments on Pending Applications

Stewart E. Sterk & Cara Marie Koss

Decided recently by Westchester Supreme Court, <i>Mamaroneck Beach &amp; Yacht Club, Inc. v. Fraioli</i> raises a much litigated issue in New York: When can a municipality apply a newly enacted ordinance to a pending application by a developer?

Sona Squares Off Against Franchisees

Kevin Adler

Sona Laser Centers and Sona MedSpas is locked in an increasingly bitter dispute with some of its original franchisees, involving not only typical franchise issues but also the franchisees' allegations that at least one of the services they offer to customers, a laser treatment for hair removal, does not work. While franchisees have received considerable favorable publicity in the fight to date, Sona executives say that the actions of the franchisees belie some of their complaints, and Sona remains committed to building a national chain of spas.

Features

Decisions of Interest

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Recent key rulings.

Need Help?

  1. Prefer an IP authenticated environment? Request a transition or call 800-756-8993.
  2. Need other assistance? email Customer Service or call 1-877-256-2472.

MOST POPULAR STORIES