Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Practice management is gaining strength as a discipline in many mid-sized firms. Long adhered to in large firms as a way to interact most effectively with clients, produce the client's work in the most timely and cost-effective manner, and generate collegiality among lawyers, in mid-sized firms many managing partners have relegated the practice of law to individual partners, reluctant to impose their judgments on how individual client matters were being performed. This results from their belief that lawyer management should not have to follow up on partners responsible for performing client work or for managing substantive practice areas.
Features
It has become an increasingly common fact pattern: An employer discriminates against an employee, for example, because of her gender. She files a claim of discrimination against the employer with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). In a matter of days, the employer finds out about her charges and decides to make her work life miserable. This might create a straightforward claim for unlawful retaliation, that is if the employer's actions made her life 'miserable enough.' The question of what is 'miserable enough' has divided the courts, and thus there may not be a clear answer to questions on adverse employment actions for employers or employees.
Part One of this series discussed the rationales courts typically draw upon in deciding whether to apply a heeding presumption in failure-to-warn cases in general. This installment analyzes the application of the heeding presumption in pharmaceutical failure-to-warn cases specifically and explains why justifications for the presumption in the general product liability context do not necessarily hold true in the pharmaceutical failure-to-warn setting.
Features
New Internet Phone Wiretap Rules Challenged<br>Congress May Consider Mandatory ISP Snooping <br>Movie Piracy Losses Bigger Than Expected, Says a Recent Study<br>House Panel Approves Bill to Ban Cyber-gambling <br>Group Sues NY to Overturn Law Banning Internet Tobacco Sales
Alleged Movie Pirate Claims Innocence<br>Online Legal Scrivener Guilty of Unauthorized Practice of Law
Features
Lawyers Get Online Encyclopedia ' and Lounge ' As Popular Sites Get Adapted
Highlights of the latest equipment leasing news from around the country.
Features
A Supreme Court ruling on May 15 in favor of eBay Inc. in a closely watched patent dispute made it harder for those claiming infringement to win permanent injunctions against major patent holders and manufacturers.<br>The unanimous decision was a major win for eBay and other big patent holders that frequently face crippling litigation from parties that get injunctions to protect one of thousands of patents used in a complex product.
Features
China recently launched two offerings of asset backed securities ('ABS') in its interbank market after several years of preparation and planning. On Dec. 9, 2005, China Construction Bank ('CCB') issued 2.9 billion yuan ($360 million) of debt securities in China's first residential mortgage-backed securitization, and on Dec. 12, 2005, China Development Bank ('CDB') issued 4.2 billion yuan ($500 million) of debt securities backed by unsecured loans from the telecommunications, energy, utility, and transportation industries. To facilitate ABS offerings, China's regulatory agencies have promulgated rules to govern ABS issuances, including the Administrative Rules for Pilot Securitization of Credit Assets, promulgated by the People's Bank of China ('PBOC') and China Banking Regulatory Commission ('CBRC') on April 20, 2005, the Rules for the Information Disclosure of Asset-Backed Securities, promulgated by the PBOC on June 13, 2005, and Rules for Regulating Financial Institution's Securitization, promulgated by the CBRC on Dec. 1, 2005.
Features
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York found that a television-production company breached its obligation to in good faith negotiate a renewal option for a time-buy agreement for the airing of additional power-boat racing programs on the plaintiff's network. <i>Network Enterprises Inc. v. APBA Offshore Productions Inc.</i>
