Features

We want to know how we can make this newsletter an even better resource for your professional needs. Are we covering all you want to see? Are there sections you would like to see enhanced or replaced?<br>Your views and opinions are essential in our effort to continue to provide you with the top notch News, Strategy and Analysis you have come to expect from Law Journal Newsletters.<br>Help us help you! Please click <a href="http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=604771980045">here</a> to complete a short survey or type the following URL into your browser: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=604771980045.<br>Your answers will assist us in making this an even better newsletter for you! Thank you.<br>Regards,<br>Colin Graf<br>LJN Marketing Director

We want to know how we can make this newsletter an even better resource for your professional needs. Are we covering all you want to see? Are there sections you would like to see enhanced or replaced?<br>Your views and opinions are essential in our effort to continue to provide you with the top notch News, Strategy and Analysis you have come to expect from Law Journal Newsletters.<br>Help us help you! Please click <a href="http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=604771980045">here</a> to complete a short survey or type the following URL into your browser: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=604771980045.<br>Your answers will assist us in making this an even better newsletter for you! Thank you.<br>Regards,<br>Colin Graf<br>LJN Marketing Director

Features

Appeals Judge J. Michael Luttig, a Supreme Court contender and longtime fixture of the conservative legal landscape, made a sudden announcement on May 10 that he was leaving the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit immediately for the job of senior vice president and general counsel of the Boeing Co.

Features

Highlights of the latest insurance cases from around the country.

As insurance coverage disputes, like all disputes, become increasingly expensive, cost continues to be an important factor in deciding whether to commence a lawsuit or arbitration in order to pursue insurance. While most states apply the 'American Rule,' which precludes recovery of attorneys' fees in litigation-coverage disputes, some jurisdictions have exceptions for prevailing insureds. This article highlights the major types of exceptions. In considering the possibility that fees may be available, practitioners should recognize that individual jurisdictions may apply exceptions that look similar but operate rather differently, and that important rights of recovery may be found in procedural rules or case law beyond the confines of insurance law. Careful analysis of conflicts of law may also be important since the right to collect fees in a case filed in a particular state or federal court may turn on its choice of law principles and whether a particular right to recovery is deemed substantive or procedural.

For more than 50 years, policyholders and their insurers have been struggling over the insurer's promise to defend and the insurer's control of the defense. Policyholders properly have been concerned that an insurance company that controls the defense of an action potentially covered by the carrier's duty to indemnify will use that control to avoid that very same indemnity obligation. In egregious cases where a lawyer hired by the carrier has abused his or her relationship with the insured ' the client ' so as to favor the lawyer's source of income ' the insurance company ' the courts have responded to protect the insured's interests. But most courts have ruled that such after-the-fact remedies are insufficient: They do not adequately compensate for the injury; meritorious claims are not pursued (in part because insureds may not discover the abuse); and the potential for this abuse alone undermines the dominant purpose of the insurance relationship ' to afford protection and peace of mind for the insured.

Since first enacted in 1874 in Wisconsin, Valued Policy Law ('VPL') has become an important regulatory fixture in the insurance law of many states. At least 19 states have enacted some version of a traditional VPL. In its original formulation, VPL obliges an insurer that collected premiums for an insurable interest based on an assigned value to pay that predetermined value to the insured in the event of a total loss. That statutorily imposed obligation prevents insurers from collecting premiums on artificially inflated property values on the front end while paying insureds less than that amount after a total loss, based on actual values. VPL thus encourages insurers to investigate the actual value of the insurable interest and to collect premiums on that amount, thereby avoiding the hazards of over-insurance. Furthermore, by encouraging insurers to minimize variance between assigned values and actual values, VPL theoretically reduces insurance fraud by policyholders.

Features

Recent rulings of interest to you and your practice.