Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The patent dispute between online DVD rental rivals Netflix Inc. and Blockbuster Inc. not only pits two big-name competitors against each other, but it also highlights the ongoing debate over Internet business-method patents.
Features
Special Referee James A. Montagnino (Supreme Court, Westchester County) wrote an insightful Outside Counsel article for <i>The New York Law Journal</i> (a sister publication of this newsletter) in March 2002 concerning the crediting of college expenses against child support. (Montagnino, JA.: Crediting College Expenses Against Child Support. <i>NYLJ</i>, March 18, 2002.) As he explained in that article, under New York's Child Support Standards Act (CSSA), a noncustodial parent may be required to contribute to the costs of his or her child's college education, including room and board, above and beyond the basic child support obligation mandated by the CSSA. See Domestic Relations Law ' 240 [1-b] [b] [2]; Family Court Act ' 413 [1] [c] [7]. However, such contributions may lead to a double payment by the noncustodial parent for room and board, since the basic child support obligation as calculated under the CSSA guidelines includes the cost of food and shelter for a child.
Features
An age-old question of Internet law has heated up the intrastate rivalry between Philadelphia and Pittsburgh, but this time it's not sports teams or gubernatorial candidates; it's judges. Yes, judges.<br>The question: When can an anonymous Internet speaker accused of defamation be unmasked? The combatants: Judge Albert Sheppard of Phila-delphia and Judge R. Stanton Wettick of Pittsburgh ' two of Pennsylvania's most respected jurists. If Pennsylvania can be split on the issue, so can other states. Which argument is correct?
Features
Two veterans of the U.S. Supreme Court bar argued forcefully ' and inconclusively ' last month in a high-stakes dispute over how easy it should be for a patent holder to win an injunction against an infringer.<br>From the tenor of the questioning in <i>eBay v. MercExchange</i>, justices seemed closely divided over the issue.
Features
Although the online encyclopedia Wikipedia recently added its 1 millionth English-language article, controversy over the value of its content continues. Concerns arise because Wikipedia has no single editor, and anyone (or virtually anyone) can add a new entry or edit an existing one. <br>Reliability concerns are in no way limited to Wikipedia, but pervade legal research done on the Internet.
Features
Recent developments in the drug and device area.
Features
Developments in the medical malpractice arena.
In medical negligence litigation, one must understand exactly what went wrong, and when, before one may litigate a case. It is this microscopic attention that requires lawyers to dissect a case in minute detail that would inspire envy in a forensic pathologist. Unfortunately, the fact is that few physicians want to engage in such analysis. Once we understand the who, what, where, and when, however, 'why' becomes much more clear, thus leading to answers as to how future accidents and miscalculations can be prevented.
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, 42 U.S.C.A. ' 1320(d) <i>et seq.</i> (HIPAA), was meant to offer a baseline for the disclosure of individual medical information. The law, calling for standards to be promulgated by the Secretary of Health and Human Services, became effective in April 2001 and full compliance was required by April 2003. <i>Crenshaw v. Mony et al.</i>, 318 F. Supp. 2d 1015, 1027 (D.S.D. Cal. 2004). The regulations are hardly a model of clarity, even for federal regulations, and frequent reference to state law and state reporting agencies can heighten the confusion.
