Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Features

Defining Success When It Comes To Legal Technology Training Programs

Judye Carter Reynolds

Software trainers find the need for computer training to be never-ending. In many firms, training programs abound but users don't seem to be gaining ground fast enough to master the array of applications on the desktop. Frustrations among users rise with the need for speed in productivity and also for trainers as they fight for training time, training resources, and willing participants. Yes ' willing participants. End-users aren't motivated to attend training that is stressful,discouraging, or a waste of time; often defined as any training experience that does not provide skill retention and mastery.

Electronic Discovery Year in Review: Where We've Been, Where We are Going

Courtney Ingraffia Barton

Last year was explosive for the electronic discovery industry. From enormous jury verdicts to proposed changes in the federal rules, the legal and business landscape for e-discovery has never been more in flux. While more e-discovery vendors have entered the market this year, mergers have also consolidated the industry like never before. Meanwhile, case law continues to grow to include not just the very well publicized sanctions cases, but also opinions that have honed in on some of the technical challenges of e-discovery.

Features

Case Briefs

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Highlights of the latest insurance cases from around the country.

Disavowals of Liability Do Not Disembowel Coverage: Liability Settlements and Insurance Coverage

Marc S. Mayerson

Liability insurance policies apply where the insured is liable for bodily injury, property damage, or wrongful acts (depending on the policy). What happens, however, when the policyholder denies that any injury or wrongdoing took place? Does that mean that insurance is not applicable?

The Federal Courts' Gate-Keeping Function for Fixed and Invariable Evidence of Custom and Usage

Kenneth W. Erickson & Bryan R. Diederich

The role of the trial judge in screening proffered custom and usage evidence has evolved with time and is now part of the gate-keeping function provided in the federal rules of evidence. This article traces some of the relevant background and discusses how the federal rules now guide the courts in the exercise of that function.

Features

The Brief Case for Insurer Standing in Asbestos Bankruptcies

George R. Calhoun

Debtors facing mass-tort asbestos liability frequently challenge their insurers' standing to appear in the debtors' bankruptcy cases. They typically argue that their insurers have no standing because the proposed bankruptcy plan is "insurance neutral." Debtors contend alternatively that the insurers' standing is limited to specific issues directly affecting the insurance contract, such as whether the debtor may assign policy proceeds notwithstanding anti-assignment provisions contained in the policy. Despite insurers' strong incentives to participate in mass-tort bankruptcies, bankruptcy courts have frequently been willing to suppress insurer objections that the debtor finds inconvenient.

Features

Substitution of 'The Sums' or 'Those Sums' for 'All Sums' Does Not Alter the Scope of Coverage

Michael T. Sharkey

One of the major issues for the past quarter century in the litigation of coverage disputes relating to liability for alleged long-term or latent injury or damage (such as those arising from asbestos bodily injury, environmental property damage, or other mass torts) has been "allocation." In particular, insurance companies and policyholders have disputed the scope of coverage provided by an "occurrence"-based general liability policy triggered by injury or damage during its policy period, when the same occurrence also caused harm in other policy periods.

Features

Integrating Software Escrows into Intellectual Property Strategy

Rajiv Patel

Software developers invest a great deal of time and effort developing complex code that performs unique functionality for which there is a viable market. These software developers typically offer software licenses that only license object code, <i>ie</i>, the code that can be read by a machine, rather than the source code, <i>ie</i>, code that can be deciphered and read by a person.

Downloading Copyrighted Songs on File-Sharing Network Is Not 'Fair Use'

Leslie Gordon Fagen, Andrew G. Gordon & Darren W. Johnson

In an important decision interpreting the fair use provision of the Copyright Act (17 U.S.C. &sect;107), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit recently held that downloading full copies of copyrighted material without compensation to authors cannot be deemed "fair use." In <i>BMG Music v. Gonzalez</i>, 430 F.3d 888 (7th Cir. 2005), Judge Frank H. Easterbrook, writing for a unanimous three-judge panel, rejected the defendant's argument that she was immune from liability because she was merely sampling songs that she had downloaded from the KaZaA file-sharing network on a "try-before-you-buy basis."

Features

IP News

Compiled by Eric Agovino

Highlights of the latest intellectual property news from around the country.

Need Help?

  1. Prefer an IP authenticated environment? Request a transition or call 800-756-8993.
  2. Need other assistance? email Customer Service or call 1-877-256-2472.

MOST POPULAR STORIES

  • Surveys in Patent Infringement Litigation: The Next Frontier
    Most experienced intellectual property attorneys understand the significant role surveys play in trademark infringement and other Lanham Act cases, but relatively few are likely to have considered the use of such research in patent infringement matters. That could soon change in light of the recent admission of a survey into evidence in <i>Applera Corporation, et al. v. MJ Research, Inc., et al.</i>, No. 3:98cv1201 (D. Conn. Aug. 26, 2005). The survey evidence, which showed that 96% of the defendant's customers used its products to perform a patented process, was admitted as evidence in support of a claim of inducement to infringe. The court admitted the survey into evidence over various objections by the defendant, who had argued that the inducement claim could not be proven without the survey.
    Read More ›