Features
Case Briefs
Highlights of the latest insurance cases from around the country.
Factors in the Classification of 'True Excess,' 'Excess By Coincidence,' and Primary Policies
In assessing whether a particular insurance policy is excess or primary, courts consider a number of factors including: the premium paid for the policy (<i>ie</i>, the amount of consideration); the specific language of the policy (<i>ie</i>, the presence of an "other insurance" clause); the form of the policy (<i>ie</i>, whether the policy specifically identifies itself as "excess"); and whether the policy specifically identifies the primary policies. These factors determine whether the policy will be deemed "true excess," "excess by coincidence," or primary. This determination is necessarily fact intensive and involves not only an examination of the subject policy but also an examination of any other policy to which the subject policy is purportedly excess and the interaction of such policies.
Features
Brillhart Abstention: Will Your Declaratory Judgment Action Stay in Federal Court?
Experienced insurance coverage lawyers know that choice of forum frequently affects choice of law, and choice of law is frequently outcome determinative. Coverage disputes, therefore, often result in a rush to the courthouse by both policyholders and insurers as they select the forum. One way insurers initiate litigation is to file a declaratory judgment action, usually in federal court.
Competitive Bidding Assistance Programs Do Not Violate Robinson-Patman Act
On Jan. 10, 2006, the U.S. Supreme Court announced its first decision in over a decade interpreting the federal price discrimination statute, known as the Robinson-Patman Act (the "RPA"). In a 7-2 decision, the Court in <i>Volvo Trucks North America, Inc. v. Reeder-Simco GMC, Inc.</i> (04-905), held that a heavy-duty truck manufacturer's unequal price concessions to its dealers bidding for special order jobs do not violate the RPA unless they discriminate between dealers competing for the same retail customer.
Features
An Uncivil Code in the EU?
In the wake of the tidal wave of franchise regulation that has hit Europe, in France, Spain, Italy, Belgium, Lithuania and Estonia, there is another tidal swell rapidly approaching. Over the last 3 years, a privately financed group of European academics, working under the title, "The Study Group on a European Civil Code," have been developing a model European Civil Code. One of the Study Group's subgroups (the "Amsterdam Team") has drafted a chapter on Commercial Agency, Franchise and Distribution Contracts, the latest draft of which is dated January 2005.
News Briefs
Highlights of the latest franchising news from around the country.
Features
Despite Presence of New Faces, Burger King, Franchisees Appear to Remain Far Apart
Developments regarding Burger King and its franchisee association, the National Franchisee Association ("NFA"), in the past few months have raised as many questions as they have answered. NFA Board Chairman Dan Fitzpatrick and other board members resigned at a meeting in early December, and they were replaced by four veteran Burger King franchisees: Bob Boss, Vernon Duckrey, Ray Meeks, and Gary Robison. Another franchisee, Joe Anghelone, joined the board in January 2006.
Court Watch
Highlights of the latest franchising cases from around the country.
Introducing The Roth 401(k)
Nine years ago, Congress introduced a new savings tool for investors called the Roth IRA. This new version of an Individual Retirement Account was named after the Senator that was instrumental in its creation, and it offered substantial tax advantages to persons seeking to save for retirement. Effective Jan. 1, 2006, legislation extended the tax advantages of the Roth IRA to include 401(k) plans. The "Roth 401(k)" creates a new option for law firms offering 401(k) plans to partners and employees, and gives participants the opportunity to accumulate significant tax-free wealth during their lifetime.
Features
The Management Side of Sales Pursuits
In an increasingly competitive legal services market, where clients are less loyal to their law firms and law firms are competing for business, there is a growing need for law firms to be systematic and disciplined in their approach to business development. Marketing departments are increasingly retooling themselves with client service, business development and sales functions. Attorneys, marketing and sales staff need to work increasingly closely as a team taking on non-traditional roles to ensure continuity in pursuit of business from first contact through the pitching and closing of business.
Need Help?
- Prefer an IP authenticated environment? Request a transition or call 800-756-8993.
- Need other assistance? email Customer Service or call 1-877-256-2472.
MOST POPULAR STORIES
- Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar InvestigationsThis article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.Read More ›
- The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance ProgramsThe parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.Read More ›
- The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year LaterThe DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.Read More ›
- Surveys in Patent Infringement Litigation: The Next FrontierMost experienced intellectual property attorneys understand the significant role surveys play in trademark infringement and other Lanham Act cases, but relatively few are likely to have considered the use of such research in patent infringement matters. That could soon change in light of the recent admission of a survey into evidence in <i>Applera Corporation, et al. v. MJ Research, Inc., et al.</i>, No. 3:98cv1201 (D. Conn. Aug. 26, 2005). The survey evidence, which showed that 96% of the defendant's customers used its products to perform a patented process, was admitted as evidence in support of a claim of inducement to infringe. The court admitted the survey into evidence over various objections by the defendant, who had argued that the inducement claim could not be proven without the survey.Read More ›
- Questions Every Law Firm Business Development Leader Should Be AskingIn a legal marketplace transformed by technology, heightened client expectations, and fierce competition, law firm leaders must approach strategy with rigor and clarity. The following questions, accompanied by relevant statistics and explanations, offer a focused guide for uncovering opportunity and driving sustainable growth.Read More ›
