Features
The Leasing Hotline
Highlights of the latest commercial leasing cases from around the country.
Features
The Sales Volume Termination Clause: Protecting the Landlord's Interests
As the popularity of lifestyle center developments continues to grow, the national and regional small-shop tenants forming the leasing backbone of these projects persist in their efforts to negotiate lease rights traditionally granted only to anchor tenants just a few years ago. One such right is the sales volume termination right. Generally, the sales volume termination clause allows a tenant to terminate its lease in the event sales from the tenant's premises do not exceed a predetermined sales volume during a specific period of time. The primary purpose of this clause is to provide a tenant with an exit strategy for an underperforming store. Although the cause of such underperformance may be attributable to a struggling shopping center, alternate causes include poor store management and misguided merchandising decisions, among others. Certainly, landlords would prefer to avoid granting tenants any termination rights; however, the relative bargaining position of the parties may require that the landlord concede to the tenant's insistence for a sales volume termination right. If a landlord finds itself providing a sales volume termination right, then the sales volume termination clause should be structured to address the tenant's specific concerns rather than serve as an open-ended
What's in a Vanilla Box?
When negotiating a long-term lease, the landlord and the tenant should specifically agree upon the condition that the premises will be in at the time of delivery by the landlord to the tenant. Too often phrases such as "vanilla box," "warm vanilla box" and "as-is condition" are utilized by leasing representatives to describe generically the condition that the premises will be in at the time of delivery. However, the differences between what each party means by those terms can be dramatic. By specifically addressing the condition of the premises, landlords and tenants may avoid costly disputes once the lease has been executed and the landlord delivers the premises. This article addresses the terminology and the common pitfalls associated with the terms "vanilla box," "warm vanilla box" and "as-is condition."
Features
In the Spotlight: Lien Waivers ' What Do They Really Mean?
Lien waivers are a staple of construction projects. Everybody knows the importance of obtaining a lien waiver, although many owners and contractors never bother to collect them. However, do they know where the waiver forms themselves come from or what the waivers really mean? Unfortunately, many owners, contractors and subcontractors cannot answer these questions, and the consequences are often devastating.
Commercial Leases As an Asset of the Landlord and Tenant
Tenants and landlords should view the lease as an asset of their business. A lease cannot be entered taking into account only those conditions existing as of the date of execution. The terms of the lease will bind the parties for a considerable period, and it is important to draft the lease carefully up front in order to accommodate current and future circumstances. This article addresses the lease as an asset from the tenant's perspective, then from the landlord's perspective, and finally suggests how to approach negotiating potentially conflicting ideas about how to preserve this "joint" asset.
Does Your Lease Have an Operating Covenant?
A retail lease should include a covenant requiring a tenant to operate in the premises. The covenant needs to state clearly and unequivocally that a tenant will be required to operate in the premises for the term of the lease. The active and open operation of tenancies is the essence of retail and what ultimately makes for a successful shopping center. A clear operating covenant, or lack thereof, also facilitates the party's exit strategy from the lease, something which is often more important than the actual operation of the business in the premises.
Features
Tenant's Estoppel Letter Does Not Trump the Lease
An "estoppel certificate" is a written statement by a party having an interest in property that defines and describes that interest so that other parties contemplating taking an interest in the same property will be informed about the nature and extent of that interest. Typically, the party signing the certificate is not a party to the transaction by which the third party is acquiring its interest. But the certificate is worded in such a way so that the party signing it is made aware of the reliance of the third party, and thus the signing party would be "estopped" from asserting matters different from those appearing in the certificate as against the third party upon completion of the transaction.
Enhancing Tenant Flexibility in In-Line Retail Leases
While it would not be possible to identify a "typical" in-line retailer (their perspectives vary as much as their products and their business plans), there are issues that recur in negotiation of leases for them. As attorneys negotiating on behalf of in-line retailers, it is important to consider the potential implications of the lease over its entire term and to plan for changes in clients' business plans by making the leases more flexible. This article examines selected practical issues in flexibility and makes recommendations for negotiating stronger leases from the retailers' perspective.
Need Help?
- Prefer an IP authenticated environment? Request a transition or call 800-756-8993.
- Need other assistance? email Customer Service or call 1-877-256-2472.
MOST POPULAR STORIES
- The 'Sophisticated Insured' DefenseA majority of courts consider the <i>contra proferentem</i> doctrine to be a pillar of insurance law. The doctrine requires ambiguous terms in an insurance policy to be construed against the insurer and in favor of coverage for the insured. A prominent rationale behind the doctrine is that insurance policies are usually standard-form contracts drafted entirely by insurers.Read More ›
- A Lawyer's System for Active ReadingActive reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.Read More ›
- The Brave New World of Cybersecurity Due Diligence in Mergers and Acquisitions: Pitfalls and OpportunitiesLike poorly-behaved school children, new technologies and intellectual property (IP) are increasingly disrupting the M&A establishment. Cybersecurity has become the latest disruptive newcomer to the M&A party.Read More ›
- Abandoned and Unused Cables: A Hidden Liability Under the 2002 National Electric CodeIn an effort to minimize the release of toxic gasses from cables in the event of fire, the 2002 version of the National Electric Code ("NEC"), promulgated by the National Fire Protection Association, sets forth new guidelines requiring that abandoned cables must be removed from buildings unless they are located in metal raceways or tagged "For Future Use." While the NEC is not, in itself, binding law, most jurisdictions in the United States adopt the NEC by reference in their state or local building and fire codes. Thus, noncompliance with the recent NEC guidelines will likely mean that a building is in violation of a building or fire code. If so, the building owner may also be in breach of agreements with tenants and lenders and may be jeopardizing its fire insurance coverage. Even in jurisdictions where the 2002 NEC has not been adopted, it may be argued that the guidelines represent the standard of reasonable care and could result in tort liability for the landlord if toxic gasses from abandoned cables are emitted in a fire. With these potential liabilities in mind, this article discusses: 1) how to address the abandoned wires and cables currently located within the risers, ceilings and other areas of properties, and 2) additional considerations in the placement and removal of telecommunications cables going forward.Read More ›
- Guidance on Distributions As 'Disbursements' and U.S. Trustee FeesIn a recent case from the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, In re Paragon Offshore PLC, the bankruptcy court provided guidance on whether a post-plan effective date litigation trust's distributions constituted disbursements subject to the U.S. Trustee fee "tax."Read More ›