Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Features

Clause & Effect <b>Contestant Releases/Physical Injury Claims Image

Clause & Effect <b>Contestant Releases/Physical Injury Claims

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia decided that a contestant on the TV game show "Wheel of Fortune" was barred by a release he signed from pursuing a negligent conduct claim against the show's producer over alleged injuries he sustained during taping. But the court also ruled that the contestant could proceed with his claims of reckless or intentional conduct.

Decision of Note: <b>Legends President Owes SC Corp. No Fiduciary Duty</b> Image

Decision of Note: <b>Legends President Owes SC Corp. No Fiduciary Duty</b>

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

The Supreme Court of South Carolina ruled that the president of the Nevada-based Legends In Concert owed no fiduciary duty to a corporation formed by an entrepreneur to raise the capital needed to produce a Legends musical in Myrtle Beach.

Courthouse Steps Image

Courthouse Steps

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Recently filed cases in entertainment law, straight from the steps of the Los Angeles Superior Court.

Counsel Concerns Image

Counsel Concerns

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Malicious Prosecution/Anti-SLAPP Motion

Bit Parts Image

Bit Parts

Stan Soocher

Recent developments in entertainment law.

Features

Sports Report Image

Sports Report

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

This occasional column will cover court rulings on sports-related issues of interest to the entertainment industry.

Cameo Clips Image

Cameo Clips

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Recent cases in entertainment law.

U.S. Supreme Court Justices Offer Mixed Views During Arguments in Landmark 'Grokster' Case Image

U.S. Supreme Court Justices Offer Mixed Views During Arguments in Landmark 'Grokster' Case

Stan Soocher

WASHINGTON, DC ' The controversy over whether developers and distributors of peer-to-peer file-sharing software should be found liable for contributory and vicarious copyright infringement has been described as the most important copyright case for the entertainment industry in two decades ' or as an issue that Congress ultimately will decide. (That the underlying unlicensed downloading and uploading of entertainment content by consumers is direct infringement has already been made clear by courts.) To this observer in the court's press section, questioning by the U.S. Supreme Court justices during the recent oral arguments in what is known as the <i>Grokster</i> case demonstrated no clear consensus among the justices.

Cooperatives & Condominiums Image

Cooperatives & Condominiums

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Recent rulings you need to know.

Index Image

Index

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

A complete list of everything contained in this issue.

Need Help?

  1. Prefer an IP authenticated environment? Request a transition or call 800-756-8993.
  2. Need other assistance? email Customer Service or call 1-877-256-2472.

MOST POPULAR STORIES