Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Features
A progressive court reporting agency should be considered a part of the litigation team, and strive to not only produce a perfect record, but to help attorneys get the most value from that record. As soon as attorneys are exposed to a few choice tools on the technology frontier, they are hooked. Those critical tools are based upon the Internet, video recording services, conferencing capabilities, and software developed for transcript and discovery management. Attorneys have discovered how easy these technologies are to use, and they enjoy adopting new practices to make them more efficient, more astute, and more competitive. Whether they tackle one frontier at a time, or all at once, the technology ends up being entrenched in their routines.
Gavel & Gown Software introduced Amicus Attorney X several months ago. However, because it is a complete re-write of Amicus Attorney using a SQL database, runs within a Web browser, and doesn't run very well without a powerful Web server, many current Amicus Attorney users could not upgrade and take advantage of the new features. Therefore, Gavel & Gown recently released Amicus Attorney 5.5 (sometimes called 5+), an upgrade to the current Client/Server version of Amicus Attorney, which includes several of the advanced features found in Amicus X.
Features
Good PC migration software provides the ability to transfer all the applications, files and settings from your old computer to your new one regardless of the hardware configurations or operating systems of each. Rather than having to start from scratch when configuring a new computer, PC migration software speeds the process and provides the ability to transfer programs, files and settings from your old machine to your new one so the new computer looks, feels and functions just like that old clunker you were used to.
The public favors reducing jury awards in malpractice lawsuits and allowing drugs to be imported from Canada, but ranks them relatively low on a list of 12 health care priorities for President Bush and Congress to address this year, according to a new post-election survey conducted by the Kaiser Family Foundation and the Harvard School of Public Health.
Major shifts in clinical practice rarely evolve as quickly or dramatically as has occurred with the practice of offering a trial of labor to patients who have had a previous cesarean section. Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) has become a relatively rare event in recent years. The popular press has addressed the issue as a matter of patient choice, while the obstetrical community has focused on safety -- both for the patient and for the health care providers. Medical malpractice liability has been cited as a reason for the decision by a number of hospitals in the United States to stop offering VBAC to its patients. If that is, in fact, one of the reasons for this move, it demonstrates the essential nature of our legal system as a check on the use of dangerous and unsupported clinical practices by our health care community.
As medical practitioners and the attorneys who defend (or sue) them have learned over the last few years, health care professionals are liable for wrongful disclosure of protected health care information under HIPAA and various state statutes. Lack of sophistication of the law in this area is no excuse for turning over medical records to unauthorized recipients, and appropriate statutory requirements must always be met. But it's not always easy to tell when those safeguards on patient privacy are paramount and when other considerations might trump them. A recent case offers an interesting permutation on the question by asking: When can law enforcement authorities access medical records without the patient's authorization? The wrong answer could leave the health care facility or provider that hands over patient records vulnerable to liability for unauthorized release.
Features
The decision by Chief Judge Stuart M. Bernstein of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York in <i>In re Global Service Group LLC</i>, 316 B.R. 451 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2004), provides a sense of relief not only for lenders, but also for various other participants in the bankruptcy arena who may face claims based on "deepening insolvency." This case is especially significant because it helps define the conduct that may subject a party to liability under an amorphous concept that is still evolving.
