Features
Editor's Note
Our readers, from time to time, contact me to suggest that we run an article on one topic or another (and I always welcome such requests). A number of…
Features
Turning Off The Lights: Safely Shutting Down An Insolvent Subsidiary
It is not uncommon for a holding company (or private equity fund) to have at least one operating subsidiary (or portfolio company) that is underperforming relative to the other companies it owns. Sometimes problems can be fixed and fortunes reversed. Other times, however, the subsidiary/portfolio company continues to struggle and may eventually become truly distressed and even insolvent. At some point, the strategic decision will be made to discontinue the operating subsidiary's business. When this occurs, strategy must be quickly developed and executed to minimize any ongoing losses and to maximize the recovery for the subsidiary's stakeholders. <br>Any business strategy should be approached with an informed understanding of the overall legal landscape, as well as the specific risks and potential rewards associated with each of the parent's available options. Likewise, the parent must understand its position in the decision-making process relative to those of the insolvent subsidiary's other obligees ' its creditors.
Features
News Briefs
Highlights of the latest franchising news from around the country.
Court Watch
Highlights of the latest franchising cases from around the country.
New Proposed Franchise Rule Released
On Aug. 25, the Federal Trade Commission released a proposed final rule, "Disclosure Requirements and Prohibitions Concerning Franchising and Business Opportunity Ventures," known more commonly as the Franchise Rule. FBLA's editorial staff is now working on an in-depth analysis of the Franchise Rule in a special report that will be distributed to all subscribers. Check our Web site at www. ljnonline.com/alm?franchising for the most up-to-date coverage. To read the proposed Franchise Rule, go to the FTC's Web site at <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2004/08/franchiserule.htm">www.ftc.gov/opa/2004/08/franchiserule.htm. </a>
Features
Inside the Domino's IPO
On July 13, 2004, Domino's Pizza completed an initial public offering (IPO) and was transformed from a privately held franchisor of nearly 2000 restaurants worldwide (1300 in the United States) to a publicly traded company listed on the New York Stock Exchange. In this interview, Elisa D. Garcia C., Domino's Pizza executive vice president and general counsel, gives a quick overview of how Domino's worked with its franchisees to make the IPO a success.
Features
Working Effectively with an Electronic Discovery Consultant
The high cost of discovery, especially e-discovery, has caused franchisors to frequently look to alternative dispute resolution. However, this is not always possible. Even when it is, it is not always wise to lose the benefits of an actual trial. Confidence that you can efficiently handle electronic discovery leaves all options open and also makes a positive result more likely.
Franchisees Unite to Purchase Franchisor
Sixty franchisees forced The Ground Round restaurant chain to file bankruptcy on Feb. 19, 2004. The same franchisees, 4 months later, became their own franchisor. They bought the franchise assets out of bankruptcy, including all the franchise agreements, the development agreements, 42 trademarks, and 38 prime leases which they assigned to the subtenants. The franchisees formed a for-profit cooperative, reduced their own franchise royalties, and obtained traditional bank financing. They achieved their goal by maintaining a united front, developing a unique governance structure, and maintaining a vision for operating profitably unlike anyone else in the casual-dining restaurant sector.
Eolas Technologies v. Microsoft: A Premium Royalty Base
In a hypothetical negotiation, what is the value of a relatively small piece of patented technology when it is integrated as a component of a much larger product? If the patented technology is part of Web browser software that is bundled with an all-encompassing operating system, the answer would appear to be — a lot — at least according to one of the largest patent infringement damage awards in recent years.
Managing IP Value at Risk
According to a recent academic overview, American patent holders pay their lawyers $5 billion per year for patent prosecution services and approximately another $2.4 billion for patent litigation (not counting payments of settlements or damages). Besides being good news for the patent bar, this level of investment in patent creation and protection suggests that patents are valuable.
Need Help?
- Prefer an IP authenticated environment? Request a transition or call 800-756-8993.
- Need other assistance? email Customer Service or call 1-877-256-2472.
MOST POPULAR STORIES
- Law Firms are Reducing Redundant Real Estate by Bringing Support Services Back to the OfficeA trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.Read More ›
- Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.Read More ›
- Divorce Lawyers' Obligation to ChildrenDo divorce lawyers have an obligation to disclose client confidences when it is in the best interests of the client's child to do so? The short answer of the rules of professional responsibility is 'no' because a 'yes' answer is deemed to be fundamentally inconsistent with the premises of the adversary system in which the divorce lawyer functions. The longer answer is that the rules encourage ' but do not require ' a divorce lawyer to counsel the client to authorize the disclosure because it is in the best interests of both parent and child.Read More ›
- Upping the Legal Training AnteWomble Carlyle's technology training and online learning programs were in need of an upgrade. Unprecedented firm growth, heightened emphasis on developing lawyers' core technology competencies, and a need to streamline and automate existing e-learning processes led the firm to initiate a fundamental shift.Read More ›