Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Features

ADR Across the Pond: The Right to Refuse Image

ADR Across the Pond: The Right to Refuse

Mark Lewis & Victoria Ford

There has been a great deal of debate recently in the English courts and legal press about two key issues relating to Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). First, whether the court has the power to order unwilling parties to undertake ADR. Second, whether a successful party should be penalized in costs if it has refused ADR.

News Briefs Image

News Briefs

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Highlights of the latest franchising news from around the country.

Features

Court Watch Image

Court Watch

Susan H. Morton & David W. Oppenheim

Highlights of the latest franchising cases from around the country.

Features

Making the Case for the Benefits of Uniformity and Predictability Image

Making the Case for the Benefits of Uniformity and Predictability

Arthur L. Pressman

Uniformity and predictability are often lacking from judicial treatment of cases involving vicarious liability claims against franchisors, yet uniformity and predictability are the hallmarks of a successful franchise system, and the engines that have driven franchising to occupy such a prominent position in the domestic and worldwide economy.

July issue in PDF format Image

July issue in PDF format

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Features

Patent Liaisons and IP Strategy Development Image

Patent Liaisons and IP Strategy Development

H. Jackson Knight

Many technically intensive companies utilize patent liaisons to augment their intellectual property (IP) work. Patent liaisons work with patent attorneys and inventors and can have a wide variety of job responsibilities, thereby helping to provide additional trained "legal" resources to a business in a very economical manner.

Chickens First or Eggs: Pre-filing Commercialization Efforts Image

Chickens First or Eggs: Pre-filing Commercialization Efforts

Matthew W. Siegal & Daniel C. Wiesner

Is it the chicken or the egg? Your client InventCo thinks it has several great new products, but it needs money to bring the products to the U.S. marketplace. Tooling costs money, as does producing sufficient inventory, and don't even mention what needs to be put aside to pay the patent attorney ' all for products that might flop in the market. "You've got to spend money to make money," InventCo's president says. "Too bad I can't offer them for sale now and see if any of them actually sell before I start the patenting process, but I remember what you told me about 1-year on-sale bars and what happed to that Pfaff guy," he continues. "Hold on a minute," you tell him, "there's a way around <i>Pfaff</i>."

Features

Nanotechnology Patents: Will Small-Scale Science Pose Big Challenges for Applicants and the Patent Office? Image

Nanotechnology Patents: Will Small-Scale Science Pose Big Challenges for Applicants and the Patent Office?

Iona Niven Kaiser

The term "nanotechnology" generally refers to the fabrication and manipulation of materials and devices on the scale of about 1-100 nanometers, and has become one of the key technology buzzwords for 2004. The passage of the 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act, Pub. L. No. 108-153, which authorized $3.7 billion in federal funding from 2005 through 2008 for the support of nanotechnology research and development, has fueled the fervor over nanotechnology. This substantial funding came as the scientific community and industries as diverse as cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, and petrochemicals were increasingly discovering that, when reduced to nanoscale size, ordinary bits of matter often manifest radically different physical properties. <i>See</i> Joseph Brean, <i>The Next Big (Little) Thing,</i> National Post (Feb. 6, 2004).

Features

The Third (and Best) Way to Use the PCT: Why the Patent Cooperation Treaty Makes U.S. Prosecution Better Image

The Third (and Best) Way to Use the PCT: Why the Patent Cooperation Treaty Makes U.S. Prosecution Better

John H. Hornickel

If you asked 100 patent attorneys walking down the street, "What is the PCT for?", the vast majority would answer that the PCT is used to file a U.S. patent application under the Paris Convention to reserve patent rights in many other countries. A minority of them might reply (particularly if they were on a street in New York or Washington), that the PCT is the way their foreign clients bring their own applications into the United States. But very few would answer, "to control the timing and location of my search and the timing and location of my examination for my U.S. patent application."

May issue in PDF format Image

May issue in PDF format

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Need Help?

  1. Prefer an IP authenticated environment? Request a transition or call 800-756-8993.
  2. Need other assistance? email Customer Service or call 1-877-256-2472.

MOST POPULAR STORIES