Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Features
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliff LLP, a San Francisco-based law firm with a global reach, contended with more than a little skepticism a few years ago…
Features
Recent rulings of importance to your practice.
All about <i>Daubert's</i> Ghost...complete with Web sites. Also, a look at ECRI (formerly the Emergency Care Research Institute) is a nonprofit health services research agency. Its mission is to improve the safety, quality, and cost-effectiveness of health care. It is widely recognized as one of the world's leading independent organizations committed to advancing the quality of healthcare. ECRI's focus is health care technology, health care risk and quality management, and health care environmental management. It provides information services and technical assistance to more than 5000 hospitals and more.
Features
Important news of interest to you and your practice.
Because many attorneys who handle professional liability cases are not also involved in cases challenging government regulations, they may not be familiar with the weight that the courts often give to regulations and regulatory preambles such as those discussed in last month's article on the new Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) regulations. This article should aid in filling any such gaps in the attorney's experience.
Features
Under the "lost chance" theory, a claimant's recovery is limited by the odds or likelihood that the event would have or will occur -- a departure from the "all-or-nothing" rule of recovery, whereby a claimant receives the full measure of damages if, but only if, the injury is "reasonably certain." If, for example, it is shown that there is a 20% chance that the plaintiff will suffer future harm, the plaintiff will be awarded 20% of what he or she would have been awarded had he or she sustained the injury.
Features
Recent developments of interest to corporate counsel.
Every company should have a records retention policy. Due to increased use of e-mail, this policy must address the changing business world by including a clear directive on the retention and destruction of electronic records. (Companies tend to use the term "document retention policy." However, due to the proliferation of e-mail and other electronic data, "records retention policy" is more appropriate.) Most importantly, the policy must provide a directive that ensures that, when the threat of litigation arises, whether civil or criminal, all relevant documents are preserved.
In order to restore public confidence in the financial market, and to reduce the likelihood of future crises by ensuring that the public receives more information about possible corporate fraud, Congress enacted the Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability Act of 2002, otherwise known as Title VIII of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Act). To achieve its intended purpose, Congress included protection for employees of publicly traded companies who "blow the whistle" on their employers. Because the procedures, time limitations and standards of proof governing Sarbanes-Oxley Act retaliation claims are substantially different than those under state and federal anti-discrimination statutes that many companies are quite familiar with, companies and their counsel need to become aware of the differences.
Early last year, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) published proposed regulations updating the notice and disclosure requirements applicable to health care continuation coverage under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA). These proposed regulations update model notices, give disclosure guidance, and establish two new required COBRA notices. The proposed regulations were originally effective for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2004. However, in September, the DOL announced a delayed effective date in order to allow employers and plan administrators time to comply with the new requirements. The effective date is now 6 months after the DOL's adoption of the final rules to implement the administrative changes required by the new rules. The DOL expects to issue final rules in early 2004.
