Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Contribution, Indemnification or Contract Image

Contribution, Indemnification or Contract

Jason S. Aschenbrand

Faced with hefty legal bills, damage awards, or settlements as a result of discrimination or harassment claims, employers have attempted to recover costs from third parties whom they perceive as causing or sharing responsibility for the problem. To this end, employers have sued unions and even their own employees in an effort to spread the financial responsibility. The theories behind such suits, and their results, have been mixed.

Features

National Litigation Hotline Image

National Litigation Hotline

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Recent rulings of interest to your practice.

Recent Developments from Around the States Image

Recent Developments from Around the States

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

National rulings of interest to you and your practice.

Features

Supreme Court Clarifies Standard of Proof for Mixed-Motive Discrimination Cases Image

Supreme Court Clarifies Standard of Proof for Mixed-Motive Discrimination Cases

Robert P. Lewis

At the conclusion of its most recent 2002-2003 term, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision clarifying plaintiffs' standard of proof in "mixed-motive" employment discrimination cases under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Civil Rights Act of 1991. In <i>Desert Palace, Inc. v. Costa</i>, the Court held that a plaintiff is required to prove by direct evidence that an unlawful factor was a "motivating factor" in the challenged adverse employment action. Instead, a plaintiff can prove his or her discrimination claim in a mixed-motive case by circumstantial evidence. As a result of this decision, defendants will find it more difficult to obtain summary judgment dismissing mixed-motive discrimination cases prior to trial, the result of which will be that more such cases will be subjected to the uncertainties of jury trials.

November issue in PDF format Image

November issue in PDF format

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Features

Hostile Environment As Form of Retaliation Image

Hostile Environment As Form of Retaliation

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Can the creation of a hostile environment suffice as an adverse employment action in a retaliation claim under Title VII and in similar state and city actions?

October issue in PDF format Image

October issue in PDF format

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Features

Letter from the Editor Image

Letter from the Editor

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

A "hello" from our new Editor-in-Chief, Elizabeth Anne "Betiayn" Tursi.

Quiz of the Month Image

Quiz of the Month

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Test your knowledge of the law!

Cameo Clips Image

Cameo Clips

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Copyright Jurisdiction/ Television Licenses&nbsp;The issue of whether a TV programming license was properly terminated is to be decided by a state, rather…

Need Help?

  1. Prefer an IP authenticated environment? Request a transition or call 800-756-8993.
  2. Need other assistance? email Customer Service or call 1-877-256-2472.

MOST POPULAR STORIES

  • Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
    This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
    Read More ›
  • Inferring Dishonesty: The Fifth Amendment and Fidelity Coverage
    Dishonest employees always have posed a problem for businesses. The average business may lose 6% of its annual revenues to employee fraud, and cumulatively the impact of employee theft on the economy is estimated to be $600 billion annually. <i>See</i> Association of Certified Fraud Examiners ("ACFE"), 2002 Report to the Nation on Occupational Fraud &amp; Abuse, at ii, 4 (2002), available at <i>www.cfenet.com/publications/rttn.asp.</i> Although the average loss through employee embezzlement is $25,000, where computerized financial records or transactions are involved, the average loss increases nearly twentyfold. <i>See</i> National White Collar Crime Center, <i>WCC Issue: Embezzlement/Employee Theft,</i> at 2 (2002), available at <i>http://nw3c.org/downloads/Computer_Crime_Weapon.pdf.</i>
    Read More ›