Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Features

The Exit Strategy Image

The Exit Strategy

Glenn A. Browne

This article addresses different ways that typical issues can be addressed by tenants in order to create "exit strategies" for their lease obligations.

Features

<b><i>BREAKING NEWS:</b></i> Same-Sex Marriage Wins in Historic Supreme Court Ruling Image

<b><i>BREAKING NEWS:</b></i> Same-Sex Marriage Wins in Historic Supreme Court Ruling

Tony Mauro & Marcia Coyle

Same-sex couples have a constitutionally protected right to marry, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on June 26 in a history-making victory for the gay civil rights movement.

Features

<b><i>BREAKING NEWS:</b></i> Health Care Law Subsidies Survive Supreme Court Challenge Image

<b><i>BREAKING NEWS:</b></i> Health Care Law Subsidies Survive Supreme Court Challenge

Tony Mauro

The U.S. Supreme Court on June 25 upheld federal health insurance subsidies for an estimated 6.4 million moderate and low-income Americans.

Features

<b><i>BREAKING NEWS:</b></i> Health Care Law Subsidies Survive Supreme Court Challenge Image

<b><i>BREAKING NEWS:</b></i> Health Care Law Subsidies Survive Supreme Court Challenge

Tony Mauro

The U.S. Supreme Court on June 25 upheld federal health insurance subsidies for an estimated 6.4 million moderate and low-income Americans.

Features

<b><i>BREAKING NEWS:</b></i> Health Care Law Subsidies Survive Supreme Court Challenge Image

<b><i>BREAKING NEWS:</b></i> Health Care Law Subsidies Survive Supreme Court Challenge

Tony Mauro

The U.S. Supreme Court on June 25 upheld federal health insurance subsidies for an estimated 6.4 million moderate and low-income Americans.

Features

<b><i>BREAKING NEWS:</b></i> Health Care Law Subsidies Survive Supreme Court Challenge Image

<b><i>BREAKING NEWS:</b></i> Health Care Law Subsidies Survive Supreme Court Challenge

Tony Mauro

The U.S. Supreme Court on June 25 upheld federal health insurance subsidies for an estimated 6.4 million moderate and low-income Americans.

Features

<b><i>BREAKING NEWS:</b></i> High Court Revives Religious Bias Case Against Abercrombie Image

<b><i>BREAKING NEWS:</b></i> High Court Revives Religious Bias Case Against Abercrombie

Zoe Tillman & Marcia Coyle

The U.S. Supreme Court on June 1 revived a discrimination lawsuit that accused Abercrombie &amp; Fitch Co. of refusing to hire a Muslim woman because she wore a religious headscarf.

<b><i>BREAKING NEWS:</b></i> Justices Sidestep First Amendment Ruling in Facebook Threats Case Image

<b><i>BREAKING NEWS:</b></i> Justices Sidestep First Amendment Ruling in Facebook Threats Case

Tony Mauro

The U.S. Supreme Court on June 1 sided with a Pennsylvania man whose angry Facebook postings directed at his estranged wife landed him in jail for violating a federal law against communicating threats.

Features

Obituary Image

Obituary

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

It is with great sadness that <I>The Bankruptcy Strategist</I> announces the passing of long-time editorial board member Harvey Miller.

Columns & Departments

In the Marketplace Image

In the Marketplace

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Who's going where; who's doing what.

Need Help?

  1. Prefer an IP authenticated environment? Request a transition or call 800-756-8993.
  2. Need other assistance? email Customer Service or call 1-877-256-2472.

MOST POPULAR STORIES

  • Risks of “Baseball Arbitration” in Resolving Real Estate Disputes
    “Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
    Read More ›
  • Private Equity Valuation: A Significant Decision
    Insiders (and others) in the private equity business are accustomed to seeing a good deal of discussion ' academic and trade ' on the question of the appropriate methods of valuing private equity positions and securities which are otherwise illiquid. An interesting recent decision in the Southern District has been brought to our attention. The case is <i>In Re Allied Capital Corp.</i>, CCH Fed. SEC L. Rep. 92411 (US DC, S.D.N.Y., Apr. 25, 2003). Judge Lynch's decision is well written, the Judge reviewing a motion to dismiss by a business development company, Allied Capital, against a strike suit claiming that Allied's method of valuing its portfolio failed adequately to account for i) conditions at the companies themselves and ii) market conditions. The complaint appears to be, as is often the case, slap dash, content to point out that Allied revalued some of its positions, marking them down for a variety of reasons, and the stock price went down - all this, in the view of plaintiff's counsel, amounting to violations of Rule 10b-5.
    Read More ›