Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Columns & Departments

NJ & CT News Image

NJ & CT News

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

What's happening in neighboring states.

Features

Spoliation of Evidence in Family Matters Image

Spoliation of Evidence in Family Matters

Bari Brandes Corbin & Evan B. Brandes

A look at spoliation law in New York, and what it means to family law practitioners.

Features

Interest on Distributive Awards Image

Interest on Distributive Awards

Thomas A. Elliot

An understanding of the various statutes and case law applicable to the concept of interest on distributive awards is crucial for family law practitioners.

Features

The Team Approach to Divorce Image

The Team Approach to Divorce

Andrea Vacca

How does the professional-team approach work in the collaborative process, and can attorneys who primarily litigate employ aspects of this approach to help settle their family law cases?

Columns & Departments

Verdicts Image

Verdicts

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

An in-depth look at recent important rulings.

Med Mal News Image

Med Mal News

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

A look at several recent news items.

Drug & Device News Image

Drug & Device News

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

A look at several key cases.

Dangerous Patients and the Tarasoff Doctrine Image

Dangerous Patients and the Tarasoff Doctrine

Michael D. Brophy

Psychiatrists and other mental health practitioners must know the reporting laws in their own jurisdictions, and take the required steps under those laws, if they want to avoid liability when a patient follows through on a threat to harm someone else.

Medical Malpractice Claim or EMTALA Violation? Image

Medical Malpractice Claim or EMTALA Violation?

Janice G. Inman

What are the causes of action for an EMTALA claim? What constitutes an "adequate" screening, and how can a plaintiff show that the screening he or she received fell short?

Features

Medicare's 'Never Events' Should Never Be Mentioned in Court Image

Medicare's 'Never Events' Should Never Be Mentioned in Court

Kim M. Ruder, Andrew W. Countryman & Alexandra Saber

Med Mal practitioners are questioning whether never events, and their related payment issues, is admissible into evidence at trial. What is the current state of the law, and what issues can we anticipate will come up in the future?

Need Help?

  1. Prefer an IP authenticated environment? Request a transition or call 800-756-8993.
  2. Need other assistance? email Customer Service or call 1-877-256-2472.

MOST POPULAR STORIES

  • The Article 8 Opt In
    The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
    Read More ›
  • Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
    This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
    Read More ›
  • Litigating Redesigns At the ITC
    An overview of redesigns at the ITC, a discussion of the ITC's recent determination in Certain Audio Players and Controllers, and identifies some considerations to keep in mind when litigating redesigns at the ITC.
    Read More ›