Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Newsletters
Stay updated with the latest insights and viewpoints from distinguished attorneys and experts through Law Journal Newsletters specialized publications. Each publication offers concise news stories, case briefs, and insider strategies crafted to enhance your career growth.
Each newsletter is expertly curated by an Editorial Board comprising industry experts who understand the nuances and provide actionable solutions.
Digital subscribers gain access to the current issue and extensive digital archives, where you can dive into past publications to enhance your knowledge and strategies.
For introductory rates for new subscribers and Enterprise Access information, contact 800-756-8993 for more details.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.
