Patent Licensing and Transactions

  • Exmark Manufacturing Company Inc. v. Briggs & Stratton Power Products Group, LLC

    The rate of the reasonable royalty awarded to a successful patent plaintiff must be based on the facts of the case. A damages expert cannot merely pay lip service to the Georgia-Pacific factors and then “pluck” a royalty rate from thin air.

    April 01, 2018Matthew Siegal
  • Claim Preclusion Requires Analysis that Claims in Newly Asserted Patents are Patently Indistinct from Claims in Previously Adjudicated Patents
    Claim Elements Taught by Prior Art for Purposes of Novelty and Obviousness are not Necessarily 'Well-Understood, Routine, and Conventional' Under §101

    April 01, 2018Howard Shire and Michael Block
  • On Jan. 8, 2018, the Federal Circuit issued its significant en banc decision in Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom. In that decision, the Federal Circuit held that the time-bar of 35 U.S.C. §315(b) is reviewable on appeal, thus overturning a prior panel decision and opening the door for parties to challenge how the USPTO has interpreted and applied that statutory provision.

    February 01, 2018Jon E. Wright and Pauline M. Pelletier
  • The tech-heavy entertainment industry is an active field for tech startup companies developing potential patents and trade secrets. But many cash conscious startups are forced to initially neglect protection planning for these intellectual property assets, instead allocating scarce resources to set up and initial operation costs. This article suggests some practical and economical steps for startups, especially those with tight finances, to protect what may become valuable patents and trade secrets.

    February 01, 2018Dr. Dariush Adli
  • Federal Circuit Affirms Finding That Rembrandt's Patent Is Not Infringed by Apple's Accused Products
    District Court Transfers Case after Federal Circuit Ordered It to Reconsider Party's Venue Objections In Light of TC Heartland

    January 01, 2018Jeffrey S. Ginsberg and Hui Li
  • What You Need to Know
    The America Invents Act gave patent owners the right to move to amend their patent claims. To date, however, this right has been more illusory than real. Given their dismal success rate so far, many hope that the tide will turn in favor of granting more motions to amend.

    February 01, 2017Cynthia Lambert Hardman
  • This two-part article aims to deconstruct the new joint infringement standard, provide insight into how the standard might be interpreted and provide practice tips for prosecution and litigation. Part 1 chronicles the Akamai cases that ultimately resulted in a new standard for joint infringement and explores the potential interpretations of that standard.

    January 01, 2017Matthew Becker, Norman F. Hainer Jr. and David K. Ludwig