Follow Us

Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Litigation Medical Malpractice

Forum Shopping for a Double Recovery: Kranz v. Schuss

It has long been axiomatic that a plaintiff may not recover twice in tort for the same injury. This directive makes intuitive sense. Although a number…

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

It has long been axiomatic that a plaintiff may not recover twice in tort for the same injury. This directive makes intuitive sense. Although a number of parties may have contributed to the plaintiff’s injury, the injury itself is a discrete measureable event. Insofar as the the aim of awarding compensatory damages is to make the injured party whole, a duplicative or excessive award is plainly improper. Indeed, such an award goes beyond the scope of a plaintiff’s injury and creates a double recovery. Tort law is designed to compensate injured parties for their injuries, not provide a windfall.

To continue reading,
become a free ALM digital reader

Benefits include:

*May exclude premium content

Read These Next