Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Growing Risk of Providing Oral Summaries
In December 2017, a Magistrate Judge of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida held that an “oral download” of outside counsel's interview notes to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) resulted in a limited waiver of protection under the attorney work-product doctrine over the underlying interview notes and memoranda. Order on Defendants' Motion to Compel Production from Non-Party Law Firm, SEC v. Herrera, et al., No. 17- 20301 (S.D. Fl. Dec. 5, 2017). The decision is a significant one, and underscores one of the core challenges facing companies seeking to cooperate with the government during the course of its investigations — namely, the delicate balance between seeking to maximize its potential to receive cooperation credit while avoiding an actual waiver of attorney-client or work-product privileges.
In light of the government's profound emphasis on cooperation — and, as a corollary, a company's overwhelming incentive to take a posture of full cooperation — a balance is becoming even more difficult to strike. In response, companies and their outside counsel often relyupon oral summaries in order to disclose factual information to the investigating agency. Given that Herrera now stands for the proposition that such acts may amount to waiver, the decision may serve to reshape the manner in which companies disclose certain findings of its internal interviews.
The Herrera Decision
In 2012, a company retained an outside law firm (the Firm) to provide legal advice concerning alleged accounting errors in its South American subsidiary (the Subsidiary). The Firm commenced an internal investigation and, at its close, informed the SEC of the investigation, upon which the SEC determined to open its own investigation. During the course of the SEC's investigation, the Firm met with SEC staff and provided oral briefings of 12 witness interviews.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
New York's Latest Cybersecurity Commitment
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.
Law Firms are Reducing Redundant Real Estate by Bringing Support Services Back to the Office
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Bit Parts
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
Risks of “Baseball Arbitration” in Resolving Real Estate Disputes
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.