Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Fresh off the heels of controversy surrounding the sharing of user data with Cambridge Analytica, Facebook Inc. recently announced that it will begin exploring different ways to incorporate blockchain into its infrastructure. Yet questions remain over how the social media company will implement the technology and what sort of legal challenges doing so could portend.
News of the decision comes as Facebook announced the largest leadership change in the company's 15 year history. David Marcus, a Facebook vice president who formerly headed the company's Messenger division, wrote in a Facebook post that he'll take lead over a “small group” tasked with determining how to “best leverage blockchain across Facebook, starting from scratch.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.